Wolfgang Tröger

475 total citations
23 papers, 395 citations indexed

About

Wolfgang Tröger is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Wolfgang Tröger has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 395 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Organic Chemistry, 7 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 6 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Wolfgang Tröger's work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (5 papers) and Organic and Inorganic Chemical Reactions (4 papers). Wolfgang Tröger is often cited by papers focused on Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (5 papers) and Organic and Inorganic Chemical Reactions (4 papers). Wolfgang Tröger collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Wolfgang Tröger's co-authors include Elmar Vilsmaier, Wolfram Meyer‐Klaucke, Gert Brückner, T. Butz, Markus Morawski, Carsten Jäger, Thomas Arendt, F. E. Wagner, T. Reinert and Anja Reinert and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Scientific Reports and Biochemical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Wolfgang Tröger

23 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wolfgang Tröger Germany 12 203 116 57 51 44 23 395
George L. Wheeler United States 13 146 0.7× 364 3.1× 44 0.8× 79 1.5× 216 4.9× 17 624
Levent Sari United States 12 75 0.4× 214 1.8× 69 1.2× 22 0.4× 33 0.8× 21 500
S. Vishveshwara India 8 136 0.7× 248 2.1× 17 0.3× 37 0.7× 42 1.0× 13 400
A. Vecli Italy 11 56 0.3× 114 1.0× 21 0.4× 61 1.2× 28 0.6× 30 356
J. P. VISSER Netherlands 13 207 1.0× 124 1.1× 82 1.4× 8 0.2× 67 1.5× 29 403
D. Vocelle Canada 14 155 0.8× 113 1.0× 39 0.7× 81 1.6× 216 4.9× 41 471
H. O. HANKOVSZKY Hungary 13 103 0.5× 233 2.0× 37 0.6× 19 0.4× 33 0.8× 27 578
George E. Heibel Germany 12 221 1.1× 222 1.9× 14 0.2× 221 4.3× 109 2.5× 16 806
Leonard J. Andrews United States 10 79 0.4× 89 0.8× 19 0.3× 153 3.0× 30 0.7× 14 442
Н. Л. Векшин Russia 10 59 0.3× 262 2.3× 16 0.3× 31 0.6× 22 0.5× 63 389

Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Tröger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Tröger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Tröger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Tröger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfgang Tröger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Tröger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Tröger. The network helps show where Wolfgang Tröger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfgang Tröger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfgang Tröger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfgang Tröger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfgang Tröger. Wolfgang Tröger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Morawski, Markus, T. Reinert, Wolfram Meyer‐Klaucke, et al.. (2015). Ion exchanger in the brain: Quantitative analysis of perineuronally fixed anionic binding sites suggests diffusion barriers with ion sorting properties. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 16471–16471. 86 indexed citations
2.
Schilling, Oliver, Andreas Vogel, Brenda Kostelecky, et al.. (2004). Zinc- and iron-dependent cytosolic metallo-β-lactamase domain proteins exhibit similar zinc-binding affinities, independent of an atypical glutamate at the metal-binding site. Biochemical Journal. 385(1). 145–153. 35 indexed citations
3.
Heinrich, Frank, et al.. (2004). The Electric Field Gradient of 111Ag in Macrocyclic Crown Thioethers. Hyperfine Interactions. 158(1-4). 79–88. 2 indexed citations
4.
Faller, Peter, et al.. (2000). Optical and TDPAC spectroscopy of Hg(II)-rubredoxin: model for a mononuclear tetrahedral [Hg(CysS)4]2− center. JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry. 5(3). 393–401. 22 indexed citations
5.
Söldner, T., Wolfgang Tröger, T. Butz, Peter Blaha, & Karlheinz Schwarz. (1998). Calculation of Electric Field Gradients in Isolated Molecules Using the FPLAPW-Code WIEN95. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A. 53(6-7). 411–418. 3 indexed citations
6.
Schmidt, P. C., et al.. (1998). Nuclear Quadrupole Interaction at 187W(β-)187Re in Tungsten Compounds. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A. 53(6-7). 323–339. 2 indexed citations
7.
Söldner, T., et al.. (1998). Measurement and Calculation of Electric Field Gradients in Hg-Mercaptides. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A. 53(6-7). 404–410. 7 indexed citations
8.
Danielsen, Eva, Rogert Bauer, Lars Hemmingsen, et al.. (1995). Structure of Metal Site in Azurin, Met121 Mutants of Azurin, and Stellacyanin Investigated by 111mCd Perturbed Angular Correlation (PAC). Journal of Biological Chemistry. 270(2). 573–580. 21 indexed citations
9.
Danielsen, Eva, Rogert Bauer, Lars Hemmingsen, et al.. (1995). Structure of Metal Site in Cd‐Substituted His117Gly Mutant of Azurin with and without Addition of Imidazole Derivatives. European Journal of Biochemistry. 233(2). 554–560. 15 indexed citations
10.
Vilsmaier, Elmar, et al.. (1982). Azoverbindungen mit einem aminobicyclo[n.1.0]alkylrest. Tetrahedron Letters. 23(34). 3475–3478. 3 indexed citations
11.
Vilsmaier, Elmar, et al.. (1982). Enaminosulfonium‐Salze als Basis für stereoselektive Synthesen von Aminobicyclo[n.1.0]alkanen. Chemische Berichte. 115(8). 2795–2806. 11 indexed citations
12.
Vilsmaier, Elmar, et al.. (1981). Stereochemistry of Substitution at the Cyclopropane Ring in 7‐Aminonorcaranes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 20(3). 273–274. 13 indexed citations
13.
Vilsmaier, Elmar, et al.. (1981). Die Konfigurationszuordnung in 7‐Aminobicyclo[4.1.0]heptanen1). Chemische Berichte. 114(1). 67–79. 30 indexed citations
14.
Vilsmaier, Elmar, et al.. (1981). Stereochemie der Substitution am Cyclopropanring in 7‐Aminonorcaranen. Angewandte Chemie. 93(3). 277–278. 14 indexed citations
15.
Vilsmaier, Elmar, et al.. (1981). Eine einfache Synthese fürgem-Dimorpholinobicyclo[n.1.0]alkane. Synthesis. 1981(9). 724–726. 8 indexed citations
16.
Vilsmaier, Elmar & Wolfgang Tröger. (1981). Enaminosulfonium-salze; 101.N-Aminobicyclo[n.1.0]alkylierung von Amiden durch ein Enaminosulfonium-salz. Synthesis. 1981(9). 721–724. 5 indexed citations
17.
Vilsmaier, Elmar & Wolfgang Tröger. (1980). Enaminosulfonium-salze; 51. Eine einfache Synthese für 6-Alkoxy-6-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane. Synthesis. 1980(6). 463–464. 11 indexed citations
18.
Vilsmaier, Elmar & Wolfgang Tröger. (1980). Enaminosulfonium-salze; 71. Eine Synthese für α-Aminoacetale. Synthesis. 1980(6). 466–469. 6 indexed citations
19.
Vilsmaier, Elmar & Wolfgang Tröger. (1979). The Morpholino Group as Stereoindicator in Aminobicyclo[4.1.0]heptanes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. 18(10). 798–800. 27 indexed citations
20.
Vilsmaier, Elmar & Wolfgang Tröger. (1979). Die Morpholinogruppe als Stereoindikator in Aminobicyclo [4.1.0]heptanen. Angewandte Chemie. 91(10). 860–861. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026