Citations per year, relative to Wolfgang Pree Wolfgang Pree (= 1×)
peers
Brad Cox
Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Pree
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Pree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Pree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Pree more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Pree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Pree. The network helps show where Wolfgang Pree may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfgang Pree
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfgang Pree.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfgang Pree based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfgang Pree. Wolfgang Pree is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pree, Wolfgang, et al.. (2012). Towards Autonomously Driving Trains on Tracks With Open Access. 19th ITS World CongressERTICO - ITS EuropeEuropean CommissionITS AmericaITS Asia-Pacific.3 indexed citations
Pomberger, Gustav, et al.. (1992). Methoden und Werkzeuge für das Prototyping und ihre Integration.. 7(2). 49–61.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.