Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Quantum cellular automata
19931.4k citationsCraig S. Lent, Wolfgang Porod et al.profile →
Majority Logic Gate for Magnetic Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata
2006694 citationsGyörgy Csaba, Alexei O. Orlov et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Porod
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Porod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Porod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Porod more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Porod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Porod. The network helps show where Wolfgang Porod may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfgang Porod
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfgang Porod.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfgang Porod based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfgang Porod. Wolfgang Porod is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Porod, Wolfgang, Edit Varga, György Csaba, et al.. (2012). NanoMagnet logic.4 indexed citations
12.
Orlov, Alexei O., et al.. (2009). Domain-wall trapping and control on submicron magnetic wire by localized field. 758–762.5 indexed citations
13.
Jacob, Ajey P., et al.. (2006). Collective-effect state variables for post-CMOS logic applications. Symposium on VLSI Technology. 132–133.1 indexed citations
14.
Csurgay, Árpád I. & Wolfgang Porod. (2004). Surface plasmon waves in nanoelectronic circuits: Research Articles. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications. 32(5). 339–361.1 indexed citations
15.
Csurgay, Árpád I. & Wolfgang Porod. (2004). Introduction: Introductions. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications. 32(5). 275–275.1 indexed citations
16.
Goodnick, S. M., et al.. (2004). Nanoelectronic single-electron transistor circuits and architectures: Research Articles. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications. 32(5). 323–338.9 indexed citations
17.
Csaba, György & Wolfgang Porod. (2002). Design and Realizability of Logic Devices Based on Field-Coupled Nanomagnets. 5(3). 347–8.2 indexed citations
Snider, Gregory L., Alexei O. Orlov, I. Amlani, et al.. (1999). Quantum-dot cellular automata. Microelectronic Engineering. 47(1-4). 261–263.18 indexed citations
20.
Michel, A.N., Jay A. Farrell, & Wolfgang Porod. (1987). Stability Results for Neural Networks. Neural Information Processing Systems. 554–563.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.