W.-J. Ong

552 total citations
12 papers, 74 citations indexed

About

W.-J. Ong is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, W.-J. Ong has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 74 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 6 papers in Radiation and 4 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in W.-J. Ong's work include Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (7 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers). W.-J. Ong is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (7 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (5 papers). W.-J. Ong collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Hungary. W.-J. Ong's co-authors include H. Schatz, Z. Meisel, F. Montes, S. Schwarz, K. A. Chipps, K. Gulyuz, M. Eibach, R. Ringle, D. W. Bardayan and P. Mohr and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

W.-J. Ong

10 papers receiving 72 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W.-J. Ong United States 5 57 27 21 12 11 12 74
T. Hotta Japan 5 63 1.1× 23 0.9× 21 1.0× 23 1.9× 4 0.4× 11 71
D. A. Morozov Russia 4 48 0.8× 9 0.3× 12 0.6× 26 2.2× 14 1.3× 13 59
T. Doke Japan 5 61 1.1× 23 0.9× 18 0.9× 29 2.4× 5 0.5× 10 81
S. Mythili United States 5 65 1.1× 20 0.7× 15 0.7× 22 1.8× 10 0.9× 7 75
B. Böck Germany 5 40 0.7× 41 1.5× 11 0.5× 17 1.4× 9 0.8× 8 84
P. S. Martin France 4 64 1.1× 34 1.3× 22 1.0× 22 1.8× 4 0.4× 5 84
M. Olson United States 3 78 1.4× 11 0.4× 17 0.8× 51 4.3× 7 0.6× 7 86
K. Han China 5 62 1.1× 17 0.6× 13 0.6× 16 1.3× 18 79
F. Liello Italy 4 82 1.4× 44 1.6× 30 1.4× 4 0.3× 3 0.3× 14 108
N. Okateva Russia 6 85 1.5× 30 1.1× 37 1.8× 21 1.8× 3 0.3× 32 108

Countries citing papers authored by W.-J. Ong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.-J. Ong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.-J. Ong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.-J. Ong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.-J. Ong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.-J. Ong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.-J. Ong. The network helps show where W.-J. Ong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.-J. Ong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.-J. Ong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.-J. Ong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.-J. Ong. W.-J. Ong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
2.
Brown, Edward F., H. Schatz, A. V. Afanasjev, et al.. (2025). Crust Composition and the Shallow Heat Source in KS 1731–260. Physical Review Letters. 135(16). 162701–162701.
3.
Avila, M. L., H. Jayatissa, D. Santiago-Gonzalez, et al.. (2024). Direct cross-section measurement of the weak r-process Sr88(α,n)Zr91 reaction in ν-driven winds of core-collapse supernovae. Physical review. C. 109(6). 2 indexed citations
4.
Kolos, K., N. D. Scielzo, V. E. Iacob, et al.. (2024). Precise measurements of the γ-ray intensities following the β decay of Ce144 and Nd147. Physical review. C. 110(2). 1 indexed citations
5.
Jayatissa, H., M. L. Avila, K. E. Rehm, et al.. (2023). Study of the Mg22 Waiting Point Relevant for X-Ray Burst Nucleosynthesis via the Mg22(α,p)Al25 Reaction. Physical Review Letters. 131(11). 112701–112701. 3 indexed citations
6.
Bollen, G., Matthew Redshaw, K. Gulyuz, et al.. (2023). Mass measurement of P27 to constrain type-I x-ray burst models and validate the isobaric multiplet mass equation for the A=27, T=32 isospin quartet. Physical review. C. 108(6). 2 indexed citations
7.
Meisel, Z., G. Bollen, E. Leistenschneider, et al.. (2022). High-precision mass measurement of Si24 and a refined determination of the rp process at the A=22 waiting point. Physical review. C. 106(1). 4 indexed citations
8.
Ong, W.-J., M. L. Avila, P. Mohr, et al.. (2022). Measurement of the Mo100(α,xn) cross section at weak r-process energies. Physical review. C. 105(5). 6 indexed citations
9.
Valverde, A. A., M. Brodeur, G. Bollen, et al.. (2018). High-Precision Mass Measurement of Cu56 and the Redirection of the rp-Process Flow. Physical Review Letters. 120(3). 32701–32701. 14 indexed citations
10.
Ong, W.-J., A. A. Valverde, M. Brodeur, et al.. (2018). Mass measurement of Fe51 for the determination of the Fe51(p,γ)Co52 reaction rate. Physical review. C. 98(6). 4 indexed citations
11.
Schmidt, Konrad, K. A. Chipps, S. Ahn, et al.. (2018). Status of the JENSA gas-jet target for experiments with rare isotope beams. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 911. 1–9. 12 indexed citations
12.
Schatz, H. & W.-J. Ong. (2017). Dependence of X-Ray Burst Models on Nuclear Masses. The Astrophysical Journal. 844(2). 139–139. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026