Winnie Uritboonthai is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Ecology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Winnie Uritboonthai has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 7 papers in Spectroscopy and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Winnie Uritboonthai's work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (10 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Winnie Uritboonthai is often cited by papers focused on Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (10 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Winnie Uritboonthai collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Austria. Winnie Uritboonthai's co-authors include Gary Siuzdak, Gary J. Patti, H. Paul Benton, Kevin Cho, Aries Aisporna, J. Rafael Montenegro-Burke, Xavier Domingo-Almenara, Carlos Guijas, Ralf Tautenhahn and Zheng‐Jiang Zhu and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and Nature Biotechnology.
In The Last Decade
Winnie Uritboonthai
12 papers
receiving
2.2k citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
METLIN: A Technology Platform for Identifying Knowns and Unknowns
2018687 citationsCarlos Guijas, J. Rafael Montenegro-Burke et al.Analytical Chemistryprofile →
Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry
2007393 citationsTrent R. Northen, Óscar Yanes et al.Natureprofile →
Citations per field, relative to Winnie Uritboonthai
Winnie Uritboonthai · 1×
×0.81.3kMB
×0.8672SPECT
×1.5464BE
×0.684CM
×1.5207PHYSI
Citations per year, relative to Winnie Uritboonthai
Winnie Uritboonthai · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries citing papers authored by Winnie Uritboonthai
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Winnie Uritboonthai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Winnie Uritboonthai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Winnie Uritboonthai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Winnie Uritboonthai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Winnie Uritboonthai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Winnie Uritboonthai. The network helps show where Winnie Uritboonthai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Winnie Uritboonthai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Winnie Uritboonthai.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Winnie Uritboonthai based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Winnie Uritboonthai. Winnie Uritboonthai is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry breakdown →
Nature
Trent R. Northen, Óscar Yanes et al.
393
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.