Win Tun Latt

40 papers receiving 794 citations

Peers

Win Tun Latt
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Control and Systems Engineering 220
  • Neurology 136
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 154
  • Biomedical Engineering 351
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 22
Replace Cheng Yap Shee with:
Cheng Yap Shee Singapore
Zhidong Wang Japan
Jin‐Chern Chiou Taiwan
Michele Basso Italy
Marcin Balicki United States
Michael D. Naish Canada
K. Harada Japan
Robert A. MacLachlan United States
Yoon Jae Kim South Korea
Christos Bergeles United Kingdom
Win Tun Latt relative to Cheng Yap Shee Singapore Cheng Yap Shee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Cheng Yap Shee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Win Tun Latt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Win Tun Latt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Win Tun Latt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Win Tun Latt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Win Tun Latt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Win Tun Latt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Win Tun Latt. The network helps show where Win Tun Latt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Win Tun Latt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Win Tun Latt Line = papers co-authored together Win Tun Latt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200972
2 200762
3 200859
4 200956
5 201153
6 200852
7 201646
8 200937
9 201137
10 201537
11 201636
12 201032
13 201331
14 200930
15 201118
16 200818
17 200915
18 201213
19 200712
20 201912

About Win Tun Latt

Win Tun Latt is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Control and Systems Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 40 papers that have together received 817 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers), Piezoelectric Actuators and Control (9 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (7 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (5 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (5 papers), Inertial Sensor and Navigation (4 papers) and Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Control and Systems Engineering (220 citations), Neurology (136 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (154 citations), Biomedical Engineering (351 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (22 citations). Win Tun Latt has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wei Tech Ang, U-Xuan Tan, Cheng Yap Shee, Kalyana C. Veluvolu, Cameron N. Riviere, Zenan Wang, Chen Feng, Ferdinan Widjaja, Guang‐Zhong Yang and Christopher J. Payne. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Sensors Journal, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Sensors and Actuators A Physical and Sensors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact