William Winfrey

1.6k total citations
33 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

William Winfrey is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, William Winfrey has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 13 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in William Winfrey's work include Global Maternal and Child Health (22 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (7 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers). William Winfrey is often cited by papers focused on Global Maternal and Child Health (22 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (7 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers). William Winfrey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Nigeria. William Winfrey's co-authors include John A. Ross, John Stover, Anrudh K. Jain, William Darity, Ann K. Blanc, David K. Guilkey, Sarah Bradley, Catharine McKaig, Clémentine Rossier and Sennen Hounton and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health and Economics Letters.

In The Last Decade

William Winfrey

30 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Winfrey United States 16 848 489 485 167 149 33 1.1k
Michael Vlassoff United States 18 894 1.1× 646 1.3× 408 0.8× 198 1.2× 87 0.6× 31 1.2k
Lori S. Ashford 12 713 0.8× 373 0.8× 592 1.2× 97 0.6× 76 0.5× 16 1.0k
Assefa Seme Ethiopia 21 682 0.8× 280 0.6× 645 1.3× 83 0.5× 113 0.8× 70 1.2k
Saumya RamaRao United States 16 713 0.8× 448 0.9× 465 1.0× 156 0.9× 68 0.5× 47 1.0k
Georges Guiella United States 17 470 0.6× 337 0.7× 538 1.1× 111 0.7× 65 0.4× 56 982
Linnea Zimmerman United States 17 550 0.6× 333 0.7× 400 0.8× 138 0.8× 66 0.4× 71 847
Fernanda Ewerling Brazil 15 657 0.8× 288 0.6× 522 1.1× 61 0.4× 213 1.4× 30 1.1k
Dale Huntington United States 21 492 0.6× 295 0.6× 357 0.7× 87 0.5× 61 0.4× 43 968
Laura Reichenbach United States 16 584 0.7× 183 0.4× 292 0.6× 135 0.8× 202 1.4× 29 1.0k
Sarah Neal United Kingdom 19 935 1.1× 172 0.4× 882 1.8× 132 0.8× 176 1.2× 36 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by William Winfrey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Winfrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Winfrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Winfrey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Winfrey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Winfrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Winfrey. The network helps show where William Winfrey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Winfrey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Winfrey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Winfrey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Winfrey. William Winfrey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bensimhon, Daniel, Heather Smith, Kelly Peck, et al.. (2023). Heart failure management at home: a non-randomised prospective case–controlled trial (HeMan at Home). Open Heart. 10(2). e002371–e002371. 3 indexed citations
2.
Morrow, Melanie, et al.. (2021). Applying the Community Health Worker Coverage and Capacity Tool for Time-Use Modeling for Program Planning in Rwanda and Zanzibar. Global Health Science and Practice. 9(Supplement 1). S65–S78. 7 indexed citations
4.
Rosenberg, R. Robert, et al.. (2020). Determinants of health insurance coverage and out-of-pocket payments for health care in Jordan: Secondary Analysis of the 2017-18 JPFHS. 1 indexed citations
5.
MacQuarrie, Kerry L.D., et al.. (2018). Consistency of reporting of terminated pregnancies in DHS calendars. 13 indexed citations
6.
Bollinger, Lori, et al.. (2017). Lives Saved Tool (LiST) costing: a module to examine costs and prioritize interventions. BMC Public Health. 17(S4). 782–782. 14 indexed citations
7.
Korenromp, Eline L., Matthew Hamilton, Rachel Sanders, et al.. (2017). Impact of malaria interventions on child mortality in endemic African settings: comparison and alignment between LiST and Spectrum-Malaria model. BMC Public Health. 17(S4). 781–781. 9 indexed citations
8.
Stover, John & William Winfrey. (2017). The effects of family planning and other factors on fertility, abortion, miscarriage, and stillbirths in the Spectrum model. BMC Public Health. 17(S4). 775–775. 31 indexed citations
9.
Jain, Anrudh K. & William Winfrey. (2017). Contribution of Contraceptive Discontinuation to Unintended Births in 36 Developing Countries. Studies in Family Planning. 48(3). 269–278. 75 indexed citations
10.
Hounton, Sennen, William Winfrey, Aluísio J. D. Barros, & Ian Askew. (2015). Patterns and trends of postpartum family planning in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Nigeria: evidence of missed opportunities for integration. Global Health Action. 8(1). 29738–29738. 55 indexed citations
11.
Bradley, Sarah, William Winfrey, & Trevor Croft. (2015). Contraceptive use and perinatal mortality in the DHS: an assessment of the quality and consistency of calendars and histories. 30 indexed citations
12.
Rossier, Clémentine, Sarah Bradley, John A. Ross, & William Winfrey. (2015). Reassessing Unmet Need for Family Planning in the Postpartum Period. Studies in Family Planning. 46(4). 355–367. 70 indexed citations
13.
Winfrey, William, et al.. (2014). Use of family planning in the postpartum period. 23 indexed citations
14.
Blanc, Ann K., William Winfrey, & John A. Ross. (2013). New Findings for Maternal Mortality Age Patterns: Aggregated Results for 38 Countries. PLoS ONE. 8(4). e59864–e59864. 92 indexed citations
15.
Winfrey, William, et al.. (2010). Return to sexual activity and modern family planning use in the extended postpartum period: an analysis of findings from seventeen countries.. PubMed. 14(4 Spec no.). 72–9. 71 indexed citations
16.
Murray, Nancy, William Winfrey, Minki Chatterji, et al.. (2006). Factors Related to Induced Abortion among Young Women in Edo State, Nigeria. Studies in Family Planning. 37(4). 251–268. 21 indexed citations
17.
Dougherty, Leanne, et al.. (2005). A costing analysis of community-based programs for children affected by HIV / AIDS: results from Zambia and Rwanda.. 5 indexed citations
18.
Winfrey, William, et al.. (2002). Contraceptive security in Armenia: segmenting the family planning market..
19.
Winfrey, William, et al.. (2000). Factors Influencing the Growth of the Commercial Sector in Family Planning Service Provision. 5 indexed citations
20.
Darity, William, David K. Guilkey, & William Winfrey. (1996). Explaining Differences in Economic Performance Among Racial and Ethnic Groups in the USA. American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 55(4). 411–425. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026