Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Detection of monoclonal antibodies specific for carbohydrate epitopes using periodate oxidation
Countries citing papers authored by William W. Young
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Young. The network helps show where William W. Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William W. Young
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William W. Young.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William W. Young based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William W. Young. William W. Young is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Young, William W., et al.. (2000). Degradation of rat enamel proteins by lysosomal proteases in vitro. Journal of Dental Research. 79(5). 1049–1049.1 indexed citations
Evans, Edward S., et al.. (1975). Larvicidal effectiveness of a controlled-release formulation of chlorpyrifos in a woodland pool habitat.. Mosquito news. 35(3). 343–350.5 indexed citations
16.
Young, William W., et al.. (1973). Polymer formulations of mosquito larvicides. I. Effectiveness of polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride formulations of chlorpyrifos applied to artificial field pools.. Mosquito news. 33(2).2 indexed citations
17.
Roberts, D. R., et al.. (1973). Polymer formulations of mosquito larvicides. III. Effects of a polyethylene formulation of chlorpyrifos on non-target populations naturally infesting artificial field pools.. Mosquito news. 33(2).3 indexed citations
18.
Young, William W., et al.. (1973). Polymer formulations of mosquito larvicides. V. Effects of continuous low-level chlorpyrifos residues on the development of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus Say populations in the laboratory.. Mosquito news. 33(3). 396–402.1 indexed citations
19.
Furlow, Bryant & William W. Young. (1970). Larval surveys compared to ovitrap surveys for detecting Aedes aegypti and Aedes triseriatus.. Mosquito news. 30(3).8 indexed citations
20.
Lofgren, C. S., et al.. (1966). Evaluation of insecticides against two species of Culex mosquitoes on Okinawa.. Mosquito news. 26(1).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.