Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by William T. Vetterling
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Vetterling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Vetterling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Vetterling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Vetterling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Vetterling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Vetterling. The network helps show where William T. Vetterling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. Vetterling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. Vetterling.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. Vetterling based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William T. Vetterling. William T. Vetterling is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Press, William H., Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, & Brian P. Flannery. (1998). The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition.19 indexed citations
5.
Press, William H., Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, & Brian P. Flannery. (1996). Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing with IBM PC or Macintosh. Cambridge University Press eBooks.8 indexed citations
6.
Press, William H., Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, & Brian P. Flannery. (1994). Numerical recipes in C.11753 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Press, William H., et al.. (1994). Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing.. Mathematics of Computation. 62(205). 433–433.629 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Press, W. H., et al.. (1993). Book Review: Numerical recipes in Fortran: the art of scientific computing / Cambridge U Press. Observatory. 113(1115). 214.10 indexed citations
9.
Press, William H., et al.. (1993). ニューメリカルレシピ・イン・シー : C言語による数値計算のレシピ : 日本語版.2 indexed citations
10.
Vetterling, William T., et al.. (1992). Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing - Third Edition. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).5 indexed citations
Vetterling, William T., Saul A. Teukolsky, & William H. Press. (1988). Numerical recipes example book (C). RPK (Politechniki Krakowskiej).18 indexed citations
Press, William H., et al.. (1988). Numerical Recipes--The Art of Scientific Computing.. Mathematics of Computation. 50(181). 346–346.3935 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Vetterling, William T., Saul A. Teukolsky, William H. Press, & Brian P. Flannery. (1986). Numerical recipes: example book (Pascal). CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).12 indexed citations
Bekefi, G., A. H. Barrett, William T. Vetterling, & Brian C. Clark. (1978). ElectromagneticVibrations, WavesandRadiation. American Journal of Physics. 46(9). 956–957.2 indexed citations
20.
Pound, R. V., et al.. (1977). Mössbauer effect inZn67. Physical review. B, Solid state. 15(7). 3291–3296.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.