William T. Penfound

595 total citations
8 papers, 155 citations indexed

About

William T. Penfound is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, William T. Penfound has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 155 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Ecology and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in William T. Penfound's work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). William T. Penfound is often cited by papers focused on Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). William T. Penfound collaborates with scholars based in United States. William T. Penfound's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, The Botanical Review and The Southwestern Naturalist.

In The Last Decade

William T. Penfound

6 papers receiving 91 citations

Peers

William T. Penfound
Leon S. Minckler United States
Raymond D. Ratliff United States
H. J. Lutz United States
Irene H. Stuckey United States
Ronald H. Hofstetter United States
Neil C. Frischknecht United States
Caroline Hallam United Kingdom
Leon S. Minckler United States
William T. Penfound
Citations per year, relative to William T. Penfound William T. Penfound (= 1×) peers Leon S. Minckler

Countries citing papers authored by William T. Penfound

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William T. Penfound's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. Penfound with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. Penfound more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William T. Penfound

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. Penfound. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. Penfound. The network helps show where William T. Penfound may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Penfound, William T.. (1968). Influence of a Wildfire in the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma. Ecology. 49(5). 1003–1006. 12 indexed citations
2.
Penfound, William T.. (1967). A physiognomic classification of vegetation in conterminous United States. The Botanical Review. 33(3). 289–326. 7 indexed citations
3.
Penfound, William T.. (1964). The Relation of Grazing to Plant Succession in the Tall Grass Prairie. Journal of Range Management. 17(5). 256–256. 17 indexed citations
4.
Penfound, William T.. (1963). A Modification of the Point‐centered Quarter Method for Grassland Analysis. Ecology. 44(1). 175–176. 11 indexed citations
5.
Penfound, William T.. (1962). The Savanna Concept in Oklahoma. Ecology. 43(4). 774–775. 16 indexed citations
6.
Penfound, William T.. (1961). The Composition of a Black Willow Forest in South Central Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science. 41. 30–31. 2 indexed citations
7.
Penfound, William T., et al.. (1961). The Grassland Communities on the Baum Limestone in Johnston County, Oklahoma. The Southwestern Naturalist. 6(2). 98–98.
8.
Penfound, William T.. (1952). Southern swamps and marshes. The Botanical Review. 18(6). 413–446. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026