William Stansley

639 total citations
17 papers, 512 citations indexed

About

William Stansley is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Stansley has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 512 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 4 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in William Stansley's work include Mercury impact and mitigation studies (8 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). William Stansley is often cited by papers focused on Mercury impact and mitigation studies (8 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers). William Stansley collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. William Stansley's co-authors include Douglas E. Roscoe, Frederick A. Leighton, Ronald J. Kendall, Christian E. Grue, Christine M. Bunck, P.G. Watanabe, Crystal J. Driver, Kathleen Clark, Lawrence J. Niles and Andrew S. Friedmann and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Environmental Pollution and Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

William Stansley

16 papers receiving 441 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Stansley United States 12 369 197 147 43 37 17 512
Jaime Rodríguez‐Estival Spain 17 444 1.2× 244 1.2× 156 1.1× 33 0.8× 25 0.7× 32 677
Daniel D. Day United States 11 184 0.5× 179 0.9× 113 0.8× 22 0.5× 12 0.3× 14 353
Kathleen A. Patnode United States 9 513 1.4× 215 1.1× 234 1.6× 27 0.6× 11 0.3× 12 658
Mack T. Finley United States 14 542 1.5× 256 1.3× 176 1.2× 52 1.2× 34 0.9× 18 711
Bernard M. Mulhern United States 18 612 1.7× 256 1.3× 282 1.9× 75 1.7× 59 1.6× 27 931
Michaël Cœurdassier France 15 407 1.1× 268 1.4× 188 1.3× 12 0.3× 41 1.1× 16 629
Łukasz J. Binkowski Poland 17 536 1.5× 306 1.6× 126 0.9× 46 1.1× 41 1.1× 58 839
Sarah Gerould 3 206 0.6× 151 0.8× 97 0.7× 7 0.2× 15 0.4× 4 401
Jennifer Best United Kingdom 9 179 0.5× 131 0.7× 229 1.6× 21 0.5× 43 1.2× 11 438
T.T. Yen Le Netherlands 13 260 0.7× 224 1.1× 138 0.9× 43 1.0× 47 1.3× 29 444

Countries citing papers authored by William Stansley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Stansley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Stansley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Stansley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Stansley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Stansley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Stansley. The network helps show where William Stansley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Stansley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Stansley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Stansley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Stansley. William Stansley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Stansley, William, et al.. (2013). Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Red-Tailed Hawks, Buteo jamaicensis, and Great Horned Owls, Bubo virginianus, from New Jersey, USA, 2008–2010. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 92(1). 6–9. 26 indexed citations
2.
Stansley, William, et al.. (2011). Liver Lead Concentrations in Raptors in New Jersey, USA, 2008—2010. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 87(2). 171–174. 6 indexed citations
3.
Stansley, William, et al.. (2010). Mercury and halogenated organic contaminants in river otters (Lontra canadensis) in New Jersey, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 29(10). 2235–2242. 13 indexed citations
4.
Stansley, William, et al.. (2007). Initial Survey of Plasma Vitellogenin and Gonadal Development in Male Carp (Cyprinus carpio) From Three Locations in New Jersey, USA. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 78(2). 181–185. 6 indexed citations
5.
Friedmann, Andrew S., et al.. (2002). Effect of Mercury on General and Reproductive Health of Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) from Three Lakes in New Jersey. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 52(2). 117–122. 42 indexed citations
6.
Stansley, William & Douglas E. Roscoe. (1999). Chlordane poisoning of birds in New Jersey, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 18(9). 2095–2099. 15 indexed citations
7.
Clark, Kathleen, Lawrence J. Niles, & William Stansley. (1998). Environmental Contaminants Associated with Reproductive Failure in Bald Eagle ( Haliaeetus leucocephalus ) Eggs in New Jersey. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 61(2). 247–254. 23 indexed citations
8.
Stansley, William, et al.. (1997). Effects of lead-contaminated surface water from a trap and skeet range on frog hatching and development. Environmental Pollution. 96(1). 69–74. 19 indexed citations
9.
Stansley, William & Douglas E. Roscoe. (1996). The uptake and effects of lead in small mammals and frogs at a trap and skeet range. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 30(2). 220–226. 90 indexed citations
10.
Kendall, Ronald J., Christine M. Bunck, Crystal J. Driver, et al.. (1996). An ecological risk assessment of lead shot exposure in non-waterfowl avian species: Upland game birds and raptors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 15(1). 4–20. 127 indexed citations
11.
Kendall, Ronald J., Thomas E. Lacher, Christine M. Bunck, et al.. (1996). AN ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF LEAD SHOT EXPOSURE IN NON-WATERFOWL AVIAN SPECIES: UPLAND GAME BIRDS AND RAPTORS. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 15(1). 4–4. 10 indexed citations
12.
Stansley, William. (1993). Field results using cholinesterase reactivation techniques to diagnose acute anticholinesterase poisoning in birds and fish. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 25(3). 315–321. 35 indexed citations
13.
Stansley, William, et al.. (1992). Lead contamination and mobility in surface water at trap and skeet ranges. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 49(5). 640–7. 51 indexed citations
14.
Stansley, William. (1992). Postmortem Changes in Uninhibited Brain Cholinesterase Activity in the Fathead Minnow. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 121(1). 137–139. 4 indexed citations
15.
Stansley, William, et al.. (1991). Cadmium contamination of deer livers in New Jersey; human health risk assessment. The Science of The Total Environment. 107. 71–82. 18 indexed citations
16.
Stansley, William & Gregory S. Cooper. (1990). An acidic snowmelt event in a new jersey stream: Evidence of effects on an indigenous trout population. Water Air & Soil Pollution. 53(3-4). 3 indexed citations
17.
Roscoe, Douglas E., et al.. (1989). Lead poisoning of northern pintail ducks feeding in a tidal meadow contaminated with shot from a trap and skeet range. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 42(2). 226–233. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026