William Smith

678 total citations
11 papers, 118 citations indexed

About

William Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, William Smith has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 118 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in William Smith's work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (4 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers). William Smith is often cited by papers focused on Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Peripheral Artery Disease Management (4 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers). William Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. William Smith's co-authors include James Spratt, Margaret McEntegart, Simon Walsh, Julian Strange, John Irving, Alan Bagnall, William Wilson, Colm G. Hanratty, Pierfrancesco Agostoni and Richard Varcoe and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, Heart and British Journal of Radiology.

In The Last Decade

William Smith

9 papers receiving 115 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Smith United Kingdom 6 101 73 56 25 5 11 118
Oleg Krestyaninov Russia 4 109 1.1× 80 1.1× 71 1.3× 25 1.0× 8 1.6× 47 132
Dmitrii Khelimskii Russia 3 62 0.6× 47 0.6× 37 0.7× 15 0.6× 6 1.2× 29 73
Minh Vo Canada 5 123 1.2× 79 1.1× 73 1.3× 39 1.6× 4 0.8× 8 140
Erica Resendes United States 5 87 0.9× 61 0.8× 66 1.2× 22 0.9× 14 2.8× 12 105
Sung-Han Yoon United States 2 98 1.0× 78 1.1× 90 1.6× 20 0.8× 5 1.0× 2 108
Alexander Doganov Bulgaria 4 73 0.7× 50 0.7× 49 0.9× 35 1.4× 5 1.0× 5 85
Hugo Vinhas Portugal 7 63 0.6× 68 0.9× 50 0.9× 32 1.3× 3 0.6× 28 105
Parag Doshi United States 6 152 1.5× 110 1.5× 95 1.7× 25 1.0× 2 0.4× 8 161
Maria Corral United States 4 117 1.2× 114 1.6× 94 1.7× 10 0.4× 6 1.2× 9 142
Ignacio Sánchez Pérez Spain 7 96 1.0× 58 0.8× 38 0.7× 44 1.8× 9 1.8× 39 129

Countries citing papers authored by William Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Smith. The network helps show where William Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Smith. William Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Sharma, Vinoda, Anirban Choudhury, Sandeep Basavarajaiah, et al.. (2024). Chronic total occlusion in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction - A multi-centre observational study. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine. 64. 62–67.
2.
Khan, Habib, et al.. (2020). A case report of capillary leak syndrome with recurrent pericardial and pleural effusions. European Heart Journal - Case Reports. 4(2). 1–5. 6 indexed citations
3.
Maeremans, Joren, Alexandre Avran, Simon Walsh, et al.. (2018). One-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Hybrid CTO Revascularization Strategy After Hospital Discharge: A Subanalysis of the Multicenter RECHARGE Registry.. PubMed. 30(2). 62–70. 13 indexed citations
4.
Maeremans, Joren, James Spratt, Paul Knaapen, et al.. (2017). Towards a contemporary, comprehensive scoring system for determining technical outcomes of hybrid percutaneous chronic total occlusion treatment: The RECHARGE score. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 91(2). 192–202. 37 indexed citations
5.
Sharma, Vinoda, William Wilson, William Smith, et al.. (2016). Comparison of Characteristics and Complications in Men Versus Women Undergoing Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology. 119(4). 535–541. 30 indexed citations
6.
Sharma, Vinoda, Alun Harcombe, Abdul Mozid, et al.. (2015). Impact of proctoring on success rates for percutaneous revascularisation of coronary chronic total occlusions. Open Heart. 2(1). e000228–e000228. 22 indexed citations
9.
Varcoe, Richard & William Smith. (2011). Use of a cutting balloon and a paclitaxel-coated balloon to treat recurrent subclavian in-stent restenosis causing coronary subclavian steal syndrome. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine. 12(6). 403–406. 5 indexed citations
10.
Smith, William, et al.. (2005). Percutaneous removal of embolised vegetation from left main coronary artery. Heart. 92(1). 84–84. 3 indexed citations
11.
Smith, William. (1952). Neurofibroma of the Stomach. British Journal of Radiology. 25(290). 110–111.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026