William S. Peters
- Surgery top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Joseph E. ChampouxJohn H. StevensLawrence C. SiegelThomas A. BurdonMario F. PompiliGreg H. RibakoveBruce A. ReitzFrederick G. St. Goar
- Topics
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (12 papers)Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (10 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineSurgery
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
William S. Peters
42 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Surgery 642
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 568
- Biomedical Engineering 298
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 256
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 207
Countries citing papers authored by William S. Peters
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Peters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Peters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Peters. The network helps show where William S. Peters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Peters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Peters. William S. Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 109 | |
| 11 | 216 | |
| 12 | 97 | |
| 13 | 71 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About William S. Peters
William S. Peters is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (12 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (10 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (256 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (568 citations) and Surgery (642 citations). William S. Peters has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Joseph E. Champoux, John H. Stevens, Lawrence C. Siegel, Thomas A. Burdon, Mario F. Pompili, Greg H. Ribakove, Bruce A. Reitz, Frederick G. St. Goar, R. Scott Mitchell and Mark A. Vierra. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Marketing and Technometrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.