William S. Lewis
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Ecology
- Environmental Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- J. H. WaiteJ. I. LunineO. MousisB. MageeB. D. TeolisT. BrockwellW. B. McKinnonM. E. Perry
- Topics
- Astro and Planetary Science (10 papers)Planetary Science and Exploration (6 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceTaiwan
In The Last Decade
William S. Lewis
20 papers receiving 659 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 576
- Atmospheric Science 125
- Ecology 101
- Environmental Chemistry 66
- Molecular Biology 45
Countries citing papers authored by William S. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of William S. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William S. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William S. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William S. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William S. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William S. Lewis. The network helps show where William S. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William S. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William S. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William S. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William S. Lewis. William S. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Althusser’s Scientism and Aleatory Materialism | 0 |
| 2 | Liquid water on Enceladus from observations of ammonia and 40Ar in the plumebreakdown → | 402 |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | Enceladus Plume Composition | 15 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Tethys and Dione: Sources of Outward Flowing Plasma in Saturn's Magnetosphere | 1 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | The Under-theorization of Overdetermination in Hegemony and Socialist Strategy | 3 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | The Under-theorization of Overdetermination in the Political Philosophy of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe | 4 |
| 14 | The Archaeology of the "Mary Rose" Vol. 1. Sealed by time: the loss and recovery of the "Mary Rose" | 1 |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About William S. Lewis
William S. Lewis is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Philosophy and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (10 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (6 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (576 citations), Atmospheric Science (125 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (66 citations). William S. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include J. H. Waite, J. I. Lunine, O. Mousis, B. Magee, B. D. Teolis, T. Brockwell, W. B. McKinnon, M. E. Perry, Christopher R. Glein and W.-H. Ip. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.