William Owens

1.2k total citations
16 papers, 956 citations indexed

About

William Owens is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Genetics and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, William Owens has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 956 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 9 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in William Owens's work include Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (12 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers). William Owens is often cited by papers focused on Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (12 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers). William Owens collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. William Owens's co-authors include Lesley Onyon, John Ashby, Jun Kanno, J. Ashby, Shyamal D. Peddada, William S. Branham, Hong Fang, Weida Tong, Daniel M. Sheehan and Carrie L. Moland and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Environmental Health Perspectives and Chemical Research in Toxicology.

In The Last Decade

William Owens

16 papers receiving 928 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Owens United States 12 565 345 150 127 119 16 956
Masakuni Sawaki Japan 19 562 1.0× 264 0.8× 90 0.6× 145 1.1× 76 0.6× 37 924
Susan C. Maness United States 14 1.3k 2.3× 539 1.6× 75 0.5× 253 2.0× 222 1.9× 16 1.8k
Kevin Connor United States 18 605 1.1× 225 0.7× 27 0.2× 194 1.5× 141 1.2× 36 1.1k
Susan M. Ross United States 12 410 0.7× 120 0.3× 40 0.3× 236 1.9× 55 0.5× 18 705
M. Sue Marty United States 25 863 1.5× 126 0.4× 105 0.7× 227 1.8× 183 1.5× 57 1.4k
Joan M. Hedge United States 17 762 1.3× 52 0.2× 250 1.7× 163 1.3× 233 2.0× 22 1.2k
Arnaud Polizzi France 19 489 0.9× 92 0.3× 97 0.6× 396 3.1× 90 0.8× 32 1.3k
William H. Bulger United States 17 464 0.8× 367 1.1× 100 0.7× 146 1.1× 90 0.8× 31 875
Lesley Onyon Japan 9 279 0.5× 197 0.6× 37 0.2× 85 0.7× 65 0.5× 9 581
Michelle M. Tabb United States 13 338 0.6× 268 0.8× 266 1.8× 588 4.6× 77 0.6× 15 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by William Owens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Owens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Owens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Owens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Owens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Owens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Owens. The network helps show where William Owens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Owens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Owens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Owens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Owens. William Owens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Zahm, Adam M., William Owens, Joshua S. Bloom, et al.. (2024). A massively parallel reporter assay library to screen short synthetic promoters in mammalian cells. Nature Communications. 15(1). 10353–10353. 6 indexed citations
2.
Owens, William, L. Earl Gray, Errol Zeiger, et al.. (2007). The OECD Program to Validate the Rat Hershberger Bioassay to Screen Compounds for in Vivo Androgen and Antiandrogen Responses: Phase 2 Dose–Response Studies. Environmental Health Perspectives. 115(5). 671–678. 31 indexed citations
3.
Owens, William, Errol Zeiger, Michael P. Walker, et al.. (2006). The OECD Program to Validate the Rat Hershberger Bioassay to Screen Compoundsfor in Vivo Androgen and Antiandrogen Responses. Phase 1: Use of a Potent Agonistand a Potent Antagonist to Test the Standardized Protocol. Environmental Health Perspectives. 114(8). 1259–1265. 30 indexed citations
4.
Ashby, J., Patrick Lefèvre, H. Tinwell, J. Odum, & William Owens. (2004). Testosterone-stimulated weanlings as an alternative to castrated male rats in the Hershberger anti-androgen assay. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 39(2). 229–238. 20 indexed citations
5.
Kanno, Jun, et al.. (2003). The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111(12). 1530–1549. 118 indexed citations
6.
Owens, William & H.B.W.M. Koëter. (2003). The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay: an overview.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111(12). 1527–1529. 56 indexed citations
7.
Yamasaki, Kanji, Masakuni Sawaki, Ryo Ohta, et al.. (2003). OECD validation of the Hershberger assay in Japan: phase 2 dose response of methyltestosterone, vinclozolin, and p,p'-DDE.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111(16). 1912–1919. 35 indexed citations
8.
Ashby, John, William Owens, J. Odum, & H. Tinwell. (2003). The intact immature rodent uterotrophic bioassay: possible effects on assay sensitivity of vomeronasal signals from male rodents and strain differences.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111(12). 1568–1570. 10 indexed citations
9.
Kanno, Jun, et al.. (2003). The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: coded single-dose studies.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111(12). 1550–1558. 73 indexed citations
10.
Owens, William, John Ashby, J. Odum, & Lesley Onyon. (2003). The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dietary phytoestrogen analyses.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 111(12). 1559–1567. 65 indexed citations
11.
Yamasaki, K., Masakuni Sawaki, Ryo Ohta, et al.. (2003). 667 OECD validation of the hershberger assay in Japan: Phase 2-dose response of methyltestosterone, vinclozolin and P,P-DDE. Toxicology Letters. 144. s179–s179. 2 indexed citations
12.
Fang, Hong, Weida Tong, William S. Branham, et al.. (2003). Study of 202 Natural, Synthetic, and Environmental Chemicals for Binding to the Androgen Receptor. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 16(10). 1338–1358. 309 indexed citations
13.
Ashby, J., William Owens, & Patrick Lefèvre. (2002). Concept Evaluation: Androgen-Stimulated Immature Intact Male Rats as an Assay for Antiandrogens. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 35(2). 280–285. 21 indexed citations
14.
Ashby, J., William Owens, Romano Deghenghi, & J. Odum. (2002). Concept Evaluation: An Assay for Receptor-Mediated and Biochemical Antiestrogens Using Pubertal Rats. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 35(3). 393–397. 14 indexed citations
15.
Kanno, Jun, Lesley Onyon, J HASEMAN, et al.. (2001). The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 109(8). 785–794. 156 indexed citations
16.
Kanno, Jun, Lesley Onyon, Joseph Haseman, et al.. (2001). The OECD Program to Validate the Rat Uterotrophic Bioassay to Screen Compounds for in Vivo Estrogenic Responses: Phase 1. Environmental Health Perspectives. 109(8). 785–785. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026