William O’Neill

35 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

William O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 37
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 136
  • Surgery 183
  • Emergency Medicine 36
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 78
Replace Krishna Iyer with:
Krishna Iyer India
S Krstić Serbia
Changfeng Dong China
Stefano Albani Italy
António Tralhão Portugal
John P. O’Shea United States
Waldemar Elikowski Poland
Josée Sarrazin Canada
Sampath Gunda United States
Julio E. Pérez United States
William O’Neill relative to Krishna Iyer India Krishna Iyer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Krishna Iyer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William O’Neill. The network helps show where William O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together William O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992109
2 200750
3 201840
4 200023
5 199522
6 201421
7 200518
8 199115
9 199113
10
Interventional Cardiovascular Medicine: Principles and Practice
200110
11 20157
12 19875
13 20145
14 20164
15 20024
16 19913
17 20043
18 20193
19 19983
20 20153

About William O’Neill

William O’Neill is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 36 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (10 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (4 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (3 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (37 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (136 citations), Surgery (183 citations), Emergency Medicine (36 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (78 citations). William O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Eric Nylén, M. H. Jordan, Cindy Moore, Kenneth L. Becker, Mir B. Basir, Khaldoon Alaswad, Mohammad Alqarqaz, Alina Alexeenko, Andrew Maree and Liliana Grinfeld. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, European Heart Journal, ˜The œJournal of invasive cardiology, Endocrinology and JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact