William McGinnis
- Molecular Biology top 0.2%
- Genetics top 0.2%
- Plant Science top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Robb KrumlaufDerek LemonsMichael KuzioraNadine McGinnisAtsushi KuroiwaWalter J. GehringJoseph C. PearsonMichael Levine
- Topics
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (73 papers)Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (35 papers)Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (21 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingMolecular BiologyGenetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William McGinnis
105 papers receiving 11.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
- Molecular Biology 10.6k
- Genetics 4.1k
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
- Cell Biology 952
Countries citing papers authored by William McGinnis
This map shows the geographic impact of William McGinnis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William McGinnis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William McGinnis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William McGinnis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William McGinnis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William McGinnis. The network helps show where William McGinnis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William McGinnis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William McGinnis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William McGinnis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William McGinnis. William McGinnis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 61 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | 184 | |
| 7 | Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterningbreakdown → | 660 |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 158 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 134 | |
| 19 | 60 | |
| 20 | 87 |
About William McGinnis
William McGinnis is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Aging, having authored 106 papers that have together received 12.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (73 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (35 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (340 citations), Molecular Biology (10.6k citations) and Genetics (4.1k citations). William McGinnis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robb Krumlauf, Derek Lemons, Michael Kuziora, Nadine McGinnis, Atsushi Kuroiwa, Walter J. Gehring, Joseph C. Pearson, Walter J. Gehring, Michael Levine and Ernst Hafen. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.