William M. Gild

14 total papers · 861 total citations
10 papers, 545 citations indexed

About

William M. Gild is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, William M. Gild has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 545 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 3 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in William M. Gild's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers). William M. Gild is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers). William M. Gild collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Japan. William M. Gild's co-authors include Karen L. Posner, Robert A. Caplan, Frederick W. Cheney, Jeffrey P. Morray, Jeremy M. Geiduschek, Deborah Kendall‐Gallagher, I H Wright and Beth Glosten and has published in prestigious journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

In The Last Decade

William M. Gild

9 papers receiving 498 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William M. Gild 263 219 182 99 92 10 545
B. Kinirons 345 1.3× 213 1.0× 73 0.4× 77 0.8× 18 0.2× 23 519
S. Q. M. Tighe 259 1.0× 221 1.0× 108 0.6× 144 1.5× 28 0.3× 10 554
P. Clyburn 248 0.9× 240 1.1× 154 0.8× 108 1.1× 35 0.4× 25 569
Victor Faria Blanc 198 0.8× 274 1.3× 48 0.3× 213 2.2× 45 0.5× 12 542
Arieh Oppenheim-Eden 188 0.7× 33 0.2× 153 0.8× 104 1.1× 43 0.5× 11 465
Phuong Truong 303 1.2× 251 1.1× 123 0.7× 35 0.4× 31 0.3× 21 521
Joanne Fortier 402 1.5× 280 1.3× 177 1.0× 90 0.9× 9 0.1× 11 606
T. Meek 339 1.3× 275 1.3× 233 1.3× 109 1.1× 7 0.1× 21 618
David C. Mackey 352 1.3× 140 0.6× 157 0.9× 38 0.4× 19 0.2× 16 466
Michael A. Olympio 279 1.1× 104 0.5× 148 0.8× 40 0.4× 7 0.1× 22 516

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Gild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Gild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Gild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Gild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Gild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Gild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Gild. The network helps show where William M. Gild may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Gild

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Gild. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Gild based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Gild. William M. Gild is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026