William M. Bowe

906 citations
6 papers · 513 indexed · h-index 5
Topics
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)
Partner nations
United StatesAustralia

In The Last Decade

William M. Bowe

5 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

William M. Bowe
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Clinical Psychology 330
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
  • Applied Psychology 118
  • Social Psychology 89
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 71
Replace Sanne P. A. Rasing with:
Sanne P. A. Rasing Netherlands
Mark Williams United Kingdom
Arnold A. P. van Emmerik Netherlands
Rachel C. Manos United States
Gabriela Kattan Khazanov United States
Yvo M.C. Meevissen Netherlands
Kara A. Christensen United States
Elisabeth Schanche Norway
Anton van Balkom Netherlands
Endre Visted Norway
William M. Bowe relative to Sanne P. A. Rasing Netherlands Sanne P. A. Rasing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sanne P. A. Rasing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William M. Bowe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Bowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Bowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Bowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Bowe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Bowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Bowe. The network helps show where William M. Bowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Bowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Bowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Bowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Bowe. William M. Bowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 19
2 191
3
Refinement and Pilot Testing of a Culturally Enhanced Treatment for Depressed African-Americans
1
4 288
5 8
6 6

About William M. Bowe

William M. Bowe is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (118 citations), Clinical Psychology (330 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations). William M. Bowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan W. Kanter, David E. Baruch, Laura C. Rusch, Andrew M. Busch, Rachel C. Manos, Blaise L. Worden, David F. Tolin, Shari A. Steinman, Scott Hannan and Lauren S. Hallion. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026