4.0k total citations 96 papers, 2.7k citations indexed
About
William L. Silber is a scholar working on Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Surgery.
According to data from OpenAlex, William L. Silber has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Finance, 29 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 18 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in William L. Silber's work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (16 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (14 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers). William L. Silber is often cited by papers focused on Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (16 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (14 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers). William L. Silber collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and China. William L. Silber's co-authors include Kenneth D. Garbade, I. N. Marks, Michael R. Darby, S. L. Sellars, P C Bornman, Barbezat Go, J Terblanche, Saunders Sj, D. Kahn and Stephen Figlewski and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The Journal of Finance and Journal of Financial Economics.
In The Last Decade
William L. Silber
92 papers
receiving
2.3k citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Silber
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Silber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Silber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Silber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Silber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Silber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Silber. The network helps show where William L. Silber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Silber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Silber.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Silber based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Silber. William L. Silber is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Silber, William L.. (2007). Why Did FDR’s Bank Holiday Succeed?. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review. 15(1). 19–30.10 indexed citations
Silber, William L.. (1978). The spectrum of emetogenic injury to the oesophagus.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 16(2). 111–9.2 indexed citations
8.
Silber, William L.. (1978). The clinical laboratory and the esophagus.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 35(1). 2–13.1 indexed citations
9.
Silber, William L., et al.. (1975). Carcinoma of the thoraco-abdominal oesophagus.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 49(16). 653–6.6 indexed citations
Penner, Rudolph G. & William L. Silber. (1973). The Interaction Between Federal Credit Programs and the Impact on the Allocation of Credit. American Economic Review. 63(5). 838–852.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.