William Kindel

1.2k total citations
9 papers, 540 citations indexed

About

William Kindel is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, William Kindel has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 540 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 2 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in William Kindel's work include Mechanical and Optical Resonators (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers). William Kindel is often cited by papers focused on Mechanical and Optical Resonators (3 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers). William Kindel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. William Kindel's co-authors include K. W. Lehnert, M. D. Schroer, David P. Pappas, Michael Vissers, Martin Sandberg, Jian Gao, Michael Kolodrubetz, Anatoli Polkovnikov, G. Carosi and N. M. Rapidis and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Physical Review A.

In The Last Decade

William Kindel

9 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Kindel United States 9 357 220 121 115 60 9 540
Hao‐Sheng Zeng China 15 765 2.1× 82 0.4× 540 4.5× 104 0.9× 61 1.0× 68 859
Min Jiang China 14 456 1.3× 156 0.7× 106 0.9× 8 0.1× 39 0.7× 47 558
Jannes Nys Belgium 15 217 0.6× 293 1.3× 102 0.8× 10 0.1× 12 0.2× 38 586
Nicola Bartolo France 11 715 2.0× 52 0.2× 309 2.6× 78 0.7× 48 0.8× 18 825
Jeremy Bourhill Australia 10 508 1.4× 248 1.1× 141 1.2× 153 1.3× 201 3.4× 32 690
Patrick R. Zulkowski United States 7 126 0.4× 61 0.3× 61 0.5× 58 0.5× 14 0.2× 9 329
James Q. Quach Australia 9 323 0.9× 26 0.1× 213 1.8× 43 0.4× 33 0.6× 29 469
Jia Tan China 12 380 1.1× 66 0.3× 37 0.3× 10 0.1× 46 0.8× 37 438
A. Pontin Italy 14 525 1.5× 64 0.3× 91 0.8× 50 0.4× 310 5.2× 32 593
I. Zapata Spain 10 546 1.5× 30 0.1× 83 0.7× 42 0.4× 32 0.5× 23 722

Countries citing papers authored by William Kindel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Kindel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Kindel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Kindel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Kindel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Kindel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Kindel. The network helps show where William Kindel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Kindel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Kindel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Kindel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Kindel. William Kindel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Taylor, J. Christopher, Eric Chatterjee, William Kindel, Daniel Soh, & Matt Eichenfield. (2022). Reconfigurable quantum phononic circuits via piezo-acoustomechanical interactions. npj Quantum Information. 8(1). 18 indexed citations
2.
Lee, Jongmin, Roger Ding, David Bossert, et al.. (2022). A compact cold-atom interferometer with a high data-rate grating magneto-optical trap and a photonic-integrated-circuit-compatible laser system. Nature Communications. 13(1). 5131–5131. 61 indexed citations
3.
Kindel, William, et al.. (2019). Using deep learning to probe the neural code for images in primary visual cortex. Journal of Vision. 19(4). 29–29. 30 indexed citations
4.
Brubaker, Benjamin, L. Zhong, Yulia V. Gurevich, et al.. (2017). First Results from a Microwave Cavity Axion Search at 24μeV. Physical Review Letters. 118(6). 61302–61302. 188 indexed citations
5.
Kenany, S. Al, Mehmet Ali Anıl, K. M. Backes, et al.. (2017). Design and operational experience of a microwave cavity axion detector for the 20100μeV range. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 854. 11–24. 47 indexed citations
6.
Kindel, William, M. D. Schroer, & K. W. Lehnert. (2016). Generation and efficient measurement of single photons from fixed-frequency superconducting qubits. Physical review. A. 93(3). 19 indexed citations
7.
Ku, H. S., William Kindel, F. Mallet, et al.. (2015). Generating and verifying entangled itinerant microwave fields with efficient and independent measurements. Physical Review A. 91(4). 13 indexed citations
8.
Schroer, M. D., Michael Kolodrubetz, William Kindel, et al.. (2014). Measuring a Topological Transition in an Artificial Spin-1/2System. Physical Review Letters. 113(5). 50402–50402. 122 indexed citations
9.
Kerckhoff, Joseph, Reed W. Andrews, H. S. Ku, et al.. (2013). Tunable Coupling to a Mechanical Oscillator Circuit Using a Coherent Feedback Network. Physical Review X. 3(2). 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026