William K. Brix

477 total citations
9 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

William K. Brix is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, William K. Brix has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in William K. Brix's work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers). William K. Brix is often cited by papers focused on Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers) and Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers). William K. Brix collaborates with scholars based in United States and Czechia. William K. Brix's co-authors include Mark H. Stoler, Mary T. Galgano, Philip E. Castle, Kristen A. Atkins, Mark R. Wick, Robert M. Strieter, Borna Mehrad, David S. Askew, Nicholas Theodosakis and David R. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, The Journal of Immunology and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

William K. Brix

9 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William K. Brix United States 7 223 138 49 44 36 9 339
Nobutaka Tasaka Japan 12 123 0.6× 53 0.4× 65 1.3× 75 1.7× 73 2.0× 27 329
X. Bosch Spain 6 207 0.9× 74 0.5× 20 0.4× 75 1.7× 54 1.5× 11 304
Dorthe Ørnskov Denmark 13 208 0.9× 98 0.7× 23 0.5× 121 2.8× 122 3.4× 23 367
Laurent Zerat France 12 377 1.7× 164 1.2× 81 1.7× 91 2.1× 71 2.0× 22 560
Chih-Wen Tseng Taiwan 12 77 0.3× 105 0.8× 66 1.3× 113 2.6× 87 2.4× 21 409
Ho Sun Choi South Korea 16 287 1.3× 261 1.9× 147 3.0× 60 1.4× 54 1.5× 38 575
William P. Soutter United Kingdom 7 288 1.3× 133 1.0× 132 2.7× 58 1.3× 17 0.5× 7 369
Laurence Lecomte France 11 307 1.4× 49 0.4× 9 0.2× 67 1.5× 16 0.4× 27 437
Maria Franzmann Denmark 8 178 0.8× 150 1.1× 12 0.2× 76 1.7× 52 1.4× 11 373
Margaret A. Nuovo United States 8 81 0.4× 34 0.2× 47 1.0× 89 2.0× 27 0.8× 18 296

Countries citing papers authored by William K. Brix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William K. Brix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William K. Brix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William K. Brix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William K. Brix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William K. Brix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William K. Brix. The network helps show where William K. Brix may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William K. Brix

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William K. Brix. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William K. Brix based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William K. Brix. William K. Brix is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Ferriss, J. Stuart, William K. Brix, Rosemary Tambouret, et al.. (2010). Cervical Stromal Invasion Predicting Survival in Endometrial Cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 116(5). 1035–1041. 19 indexed citations
2.
Galgano, Mary T., et al.. (2010). Using Biomarkers as Objective Standards in the Diagnosis of Cervical Biopsies. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 34(8). 1077–1087. 190 indexed citations
3.
Park, Stacy J., Marie D. Burdick, William K. Brix, et al.. (2010). Neutropenia Enhances Lung Dendritic Cell Recruitment in Response to Aspergillus via a Cytokine-to-Chemokine Amplification Loop. The Journal of Immunology. 185(10). 6190–6197. 45 indexed citations
4.
Taylor, Matthew D., Philip W. Smith, William K. Brix, et al.. (2009). Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and tumor marker expression in non–small cell lung cancer. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 137(1). 43–48. 26 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, Matthew D., Philip W. Smith, William K. Brix, et al.. (2009). Correlations between selected tumor markers and fluorodeoxyglucose maximal standardized uptake values in esophageal cancer☆. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 35(4). 699–705. 21 indexed citations
6.
Brix, William K., et al.. (2009). Idiopathic Lymphoplasmacellular mucositis‐dermatitis. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 37(4). 426–431. 24 indexed citations
7.
Ferriss, J. Stuart, William K. Brix, Melissa Henretta, et al.. (2009). Extent of cervical involvement in endometrial cancer as a predictor of outcome. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 27(15_suppl). e16566–e16566. 1 indexed citations
8.
Kennedy, Jamie L.W., et al.. (2008). Actinomycotic Endocarditis of the Eustachian Valve. Echocardiography. 25(5). 540–542. 7 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Christopher D., et al.. (2007). Effect of endometrioma cyst fluid exposure on peritoneal adhesion formation in a rabbit model. Fertility and Sterility. 87(5). 1173–1179. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026