William J. Porter

1.0k total citations
41 papers, 771 citations indexed

About

William J. Porter is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, William J. Porter has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 771 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 16 papers in Materials Chemistry and 14 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in William J. Porter's work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (10 papers) and High Temperature Alloys and Creep (9 papers). William J. Porter is often cited by papers focused on Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (10 papers) and High Temperature Alloys and Creep (9 papers). William J. Porter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and Germany. William J. Porter's co-authors include Robert John, Joaquín E. Drut, Reji John, Patrick J. Golden, Adam L. Pilchak, Sushant K. Jha, C. J. Szczepanski, M.J. Caton, D. Eylon and Triplicane A. Parthasarathy and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and Physical Review A.

In The Last Decade

William J. Porter

39 papers receiving 742 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William J. Porter United States 17 402 391 356 171 97 41 771
Christopher M. Hefferan United States 14 473 1.2× 568 1.5× 258 0.7× 38 0.2× 44 0.5× 19 786
Tom W. J. de Geus Netherlands 13 206 0.5× 236 0.6× 273 0.8× 25 0.1× 39 0.4× 27 511
G Hommes United States 8 516 1.3× 832 2.1× 305 0.9× 87 0.5× 77 0.8× 9 998
Ming Huang United Kingdom 15 223 0.6× 156 0.4× 277 0.8× 113 0.7× 8 0.1× 37 663
Jinpeng Chang United States 8 212 0.5× 488 1.2× 149 0.4× 93 0.5× 40 0.4× 13 577
I. Campos Mexico 16 605 1.5× 552 1.4× 600 1.7× 132 0.8× 48 0.5× 48 963
A.R. Massih Sweden 18 258 0.6× 903 2.3× 154 0.4× 27 0.2× 67 0.7× 74 1.1k
Thomas Hochrainer Germany 17 559 1.4× 825 2.1× 409 1.1× 88 0.5× 67 0.7× 57 986
Moono Rhee United States 9 321 0.8× 615 1.6× 295 0.8× 67 0.4× 31 0.3× 18 722
Minoru Narui Japan 20 431 1.1× 913 2.3× 236 0.7× 35 0.2× 192 2.0× 86 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by William J. Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Porter. The network helps show where William J. Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Porter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Porter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Porter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Porter. William J. Porter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sinha, V., Adam L. Pilchak, Sudhanshu Kumar Jha, et al.. (2018). Correlating Scatter in Fatigue Life with Fracture Mechanisms in Forged Ti-6242Si Alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 49(4). 1061–1078. 32 indexed citations
2.
Porter, William J., et al.. (2017). Thermodynamics of one-dimensional SU(4) and SU(6) fermions with attractive interactions. Physical review. A. 95(3). 5 indexed citations
4.
Porter, William J., et al.. (2016). Ground state of the two-dimensional attractive Fermi gas: Essential properties from few to many body. Physical review. A. 93(3). 17 indexed citations
5.
Parthasarathy, Triplicane A., et al.. (2016). Development of a microstructure-sensitive design tool for high temperature strain rate sensitive flow stress of IN100 Ni-base superalloy. Materials Science and Engineering A. 661. 247–253. 5 indexed citations
6.
Drut, Joaquín E. & William J. Porter. (2016). Entanglement, noise, and the cumulant expansion. Physical review. E. 93(4). 43301–43301. 18 indexed citations
7.
Drut, Joaquín E. & William J. Porter. (2015). Convexity of the Entanglement Entropy of SU(2N)-Symmetric Fermions with Attractive Interactions. Physical Review Letters. 114(5). 50402–50402. 2 indexed citations
8.
Porter, William J., et al.. (2015). Universality in one-dimensional fermions at finite temperature: Density, pressure, compressibility, and contact. Physical Review A. 91(3). 28 indexed citations
9.
Drut, Joaquín E. & William J. Porter. (2015). Hybrid Monte Carlo approach to the entanglement entropy of interacting fermions. Physical Review B. 92(12). 22 indexed citations
10.
Porter, William J., et al.. (2015). Few-fermion systems in one dimension: Ground- and excited-state energies and contacts. Physical Review A. 92(1). 14 indexed citations
11.
Sabelkin, V., et al.. (2013). Monotonic tension and creep behavior of single crystal CMSX-486 under combustion environment. Materials Science and Engineering A. 569. 106–116. 8 indexed citations
12.
Caton, M.J., et al.. (2011). Stress ratio effects on small fatigue crack growth in Ti–6Al–4V. International Journal of Fatigue. 38. 36–45. 79 indexed citations
13.
Brockman, Robert A., Adam L. Pilchak, William J. Porter, & Reji John. (2011). Estimation of grain boundary diffusivity in near-α titanium polycrystals. Scripta Materialia. 65(6). 513–515. 12 indexed citations
14.
Jha, Sushant K., C. J. Szczepanski, Patrick J. Golden, William J. Porter, & Reji John. (2011). Characterization of fatigue crack-initiation facets in relation to lifetime variability in Ti–6Al–4V. International Journal of Fatigue. 42. 248–257. 114 indexed citations
15.
Mall, S., et al.. (2010). High temperature fretting fatigue behavior of IN100☆. International Journal of Fatigue. 32(8). 1289–1298. 17 indexed citations
16.
Golden, Patrick J., Reji John, & William J. Porter. (2009). Variability in room temperature fatigue life of alpha+beta processed Ti–6Al–4V. International Journal of Fatigue. 31(11-12). 1764–1770. 19 indexed citations
17.
John, Reji, et al.. (2009). Fatigue variability of a single crystal superalloy at elevated temperature. International Journal of Fatigue. 31(11-12). 1758–1763. 15 indexed citations
18.
Porter, William J.. (2004). Revival Sent From God: what the Bible teaches for the church today by Raymond Ortlund Jr (Leicester: IVP, 2000. pb. £9.99. ISBN 0-85111-534-9). ˜The œEvangelical quarterly. 76(1). 83–84. 1 indexed citations
19.
John, Robert, William J. Porter, & Steven E. Olson. (2003). Measurement and modeling of orthotropic elastic behavior of grains in a gamma titanium aluminide alloy. Intermetallics. 12(1). 1–9. 4 indexed citations
20.
Sunder, R., William J. Porter, & Noel E. Ashbaugh. (2002). The role of air in fatigue load interaction. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures. 26(1). 1–16. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026