William J. Hucker
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Internal Medicine top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Igor R. EfimovJohn DohertyVadim V. FedorovTy J. GluckmanJames L. JanuzziFrank C. P. YinKevin D. CostaSarah A. Spinler
- Topics
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (16 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (15 papers)Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Internal MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySlovakia
In The Last Decade
William J. Hucker
37 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.3k
- Internal Medicine 437
- Molecular Biology 257
- Surgery 181
- Cell Biology 166
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Hucker
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Hucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Hucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Hucker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Hucker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Hucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Hucker. The network helps show where William J. Hucker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Hucker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Hucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Hucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Hucker. William J. Hucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2020 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulantsbreakdown → | 201 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2017 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Management of Bleeding in Patients on Oral Anticoagulantsbreakdown → | 263 |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 118 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 62 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About William J. Hucker
William J. Hucker is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (16 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (15 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (437 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (55 citations). William J. Hucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Igor R. Efimov, John Doherty, Vadim V. Fedorov, Ty J. Gluckman, James L. Januzzi, Frank C. P. Yin, Kevin D. Costa, Sarah A. Spinler, Thomas L. Ortel and Sherry J. Saxonhouse. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.