William Hodgetts

1.3k total citations
55 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

William Hodgetts is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, William Hodgetts has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 19 papers in Otorhinolaryngology and 14 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in William Hodgetts's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (27 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (18 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers). William Hodgetts is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (27 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (18 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers). William Hodgetts collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. William Hodgetts's co-authors include Jana Rieger, Donald G. Jamieson, Karen Yu, Anders Tjellström, Susan Scollie, F.M. Snik, Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus, Olivier Sterkers, John F. Wolfaardt and David Proops and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

William Hodgetts

55 papers receiving 966 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Hodgetts Canada 17 637 369 329 304 161 55 1.0k
Domenico Cuda Italy 18 573 0.9× 265 0.7× 389 1.2× 167 0.5× 106 0.7× 88 966
Il Joon Moon South Korea 24 940 1.5× 462 1.3× 747 2.3× 464 1.5× 368 2.3× 134 2.0k
A. Robier France 18 612 1.0× 381 1.0× 511 1.6× 309 1.0× 225 1.4× 61 1.2k
Joseph M. Chen Canada 27 875 1.4× 525 1.4× 704 2.1× 410 1.3× 473 2.9× 101 2.0k
Mark Flynn Australia 18 448 0.7× 470 1.3× 240 0.7× 110 0.4× 353 2.2× 66 1.1k
Elisabetta Genovese Italy 22 508 0.8× 576 1.6× 456 1.4× 244 0.8× 342 2.1× 101 1.5k
R. Schönweiler Germany 20 464 0.7× 341 0.9× 302 0.9× 177 0.6× 190 1.2× 94 1.2k
Torsten Rahne Germany 22 846 1.3× 590 1.6× 552 1.7× 150 0.5× 206 1.3× 137 1.5k
Arjan J. Bosman Netherlands 20 885 1.4× 720 2.0× 584 1.8× 179 0.6× 207 1.3× 44 1.2k
D. Bakhos France 19 345 0.5× 336 0.9× 295 0.9× 132 0.4× 269 1.7× 104 996

Countries citing papers authored by William Hodgetts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Hodgetts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Hodgetts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Hodgetts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Hodgetts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Hodgetts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Hodgetts. The network helps show where William Hodgetts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Hodgetts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Hodgetts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Hodgetts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Hodgetts. William Hodgetts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Håkansson, Bo, et al.. (2022). A novel method for objective in-situ measurement of audibility in bone conduction hearing devices – a pilot study using a skin drive BCD. International Journal of Audiology. 62(4). 357–361. 6 indexed citations
2.
Hodgetts, William, et al.. (2022). Which threshold do we trust? A comparison of threshold measurements in adult bone-conduction device users and normal hearing adults. Hearing Research. 421. 108491–108491. 3 indexed citations
3.
Johansson, Martin L., et al.. (2021). Psychosocial outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment: An overview of the relevant literature. International Journal of Audiology. 60(9). 641–649. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cummine, Jacqueline, et al.. (2021). From lollipops to lidocaine: The need for a universal print-to-speech framework.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 75(3). 279–298. 1 indexed citations
5.
Hopper, Tammy, et al.. (2021). Development of a case definition for hearing loss in community-based older adults: a cross-sectional validation study. CMAJ Open. 9(3). E796–E801. 2 indexed citations
6.
Håkansson, Bo, et al.. (2020). The Mechanical Impedance of the Human Skull via Direct Bone Conduction Implants. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
7.
Håkansson, Bo, et al.. (2020). <p>The Mechanical Impedance of the Human Skull via Direct Bone Conduction Implants</p>. Medical Devices Evidence and Research. Volume 13. 293–313. 14 indexed citations
8.
Johansson, Martin L., et al.. (2020). Hearing outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment in adults: a scoping review. International Journal of Audiology. 60(4). 239–245. 21 indexed citations
10.
Westover, Lindsey, et al.. (2019). To Go or Not to Go: Exploring brain activation during response inhibition reading tasks. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
11.
Westover, Lindsey, et al.. (2018). Application of the advanced system for implant stability testing (ASIST) to natural teeth for noninvasive evaluation of the tooth root interface. Journal of Biomechanics. 69. 129–137. 7 indexed citations
12.
Constantinescu, Gabriela, et al.. (2017). Designing a Mobile Health App for Patients With Dysphagia Following Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 4(1). e3–e3. 23 indexed citations
13.
Constantinescu, Gabriela, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of an Automated Swallow-Detection Algorithm Using Visual Biofeedback in Healthy Adults and Head and Neck Cancer Survivors. Dysphagia. 33(3). 345–357. 18 indexed citations
14.
Westover, Lindsey, et al.. (2017). Comparison of implant stability measurement devices for bone-anchored hearing aid systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 119(1). 178–184. 7 indexed citations
15.
Westover, Lindsey, et al.. (2016). Advanced System for Implant Stability Testing (ASIST). Journal of Biomechanics. 49(15). 3651–3659. 17 indexed citations
17.
Hodgetts, William, Bo Håkansson, Paul Hagler, & Sigfrid D. Soli. (2010). A comparison of three approaches to verifying aided Baha output. International Journal of Audiology. 49(4). 286–295. 15 indexed citations
18.
Hodgetts, William, Paul Hagler, Bo Håkansson, & Sigfrid D. Soli. (2010). Technology-Limited and Patient-Derived Versus Audibility-Derived Fittings in Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Users: A Validation Study. Ear and Hearing. 32(1). 31–39. 16 indexed citations
19.
Hodgetts, William, et al.. (2007). The Effects of Listening Environment and Earphone Style on Preferred Listening Levels of Normal Hearing Adults Using an MP3 Player. Ear and Hearing. 28(3). 290–297. 98 indexed citations
20.
Snik, F.M., Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus, David Proops, et al.. (2005). Consensus Statements on the BAHA System: Where Do We Stand at Present?. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology. 114(12_suppl). 2–12. 210 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026