William G. Frederick

912 total citations
25 papers, 727 citations indexed

About

William G. Frederick is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, William G. Frederick has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 727 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in William G. Frederick's work include Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (3 papers). William G. Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (3 papers). William G. Frederick collaborates with scholars based in United States. William G. Frederick's co-authors include William E. Cooper, E. Segal, W.E. Wallace, V. U. S. Rao, S. G. Sankar, H. J. Garrett, Steven Ledbetter, Donald K. MacCallum, Lawrence J. Scaletta and John H. Lillie and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Ecological Economics and Experimental Cell Research.

In The Last Decade

William G. Frederick

20 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William G. Frederick United States 9 378 225 220 111 103 25 727
M. Kato Japan 18 278 0.7× 31 0.1× 84 0.4× 20 0.2× 110 1.1× 58 957
Kagari Aoki Japan 21 90 0.2× 106 0.5× 663 3.0× 23 0.2× 156 1.5× 41 1.2k
Alan R. Goldizen Australia 6 172 0.5× 97 0.4× 133 0.6× 47 0.4× 154 1.5× 8 454
Klaus Günther Germany 13 63 0.2× 82 0.4× 205 0.9× 167 1.5× 73 0.7× 74 715
M. C. Santos Brazil 11 92 0.2× 42 0.2× 102 0.5× 5 0.0× 42 0.4× 19 514
Valentina Caorsi Italy 14 143 0.4× 128 0.6× 111 0.5× 3 0.0× 15 0.1× 46 600
L. Huisman Netherlands 9 29 0.1× 146 0.6× 375 1.7× 18 0.2× 35 0.3× 12 717
Ulrich Lehmann Germany 14 125 0.3× 38 0.2× 75 0.3× 114 1.0× 14 0.1× 46 626
R. Rappaport United States 24 120 0.3× 45 0.2× 145 0.7× 9 0.1× 15 0.1× 54 2.1k
Erik R. Olson United States 19 133 0.4× 159 0.7× 407 1.9× 14 0.1× 78 0.8× 77 988

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Frederick. The network helps show where William G. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Frederick. William G. Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cooper, William E. & William G. Frederick. (2009). Predator lethality, optimal escape behavior, and autotomy. Behavioral Ecology. 21(1). 91–96. 77 indexed citations
2.
Cooper, William E., Roger A. Anderson, & William G. Frederick. (2007). Prey Size Selection under Simultaneous Choice by the Broad‐Headed Skink (Eumeces laticeps). Ethology. 113(5). 417–425. 6 indexed citations
3.
Kuznar, Lawrence A., et al.. (2007). Effect of Nepotism on the Evolution of Social Inequality. Opus: Research & Creativity (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne). 1 indexed citations
4.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (2006). Comparison of Pelican single-use multibite biopsy forceps and traditional double-bite forceps: evaluation in a porcine model. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 64(4). 582–588.
5.
Cooper, William E. & William G. Frederick. (2006). Optimal flight initiation distance. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 244(1). 59–67. 319 indexed citations
6.
Kuznar, Lawrence A. & William G. Frederick. (2003). Environmental constraints and sigmoid utility: implications for value, risk sensitivity, and social status. Ecological Economics. 46(2). 293–306. 19 indexed citations
7.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1995). The Mathematical Judge: A Fable. College Mathematics Journal. 26(5). 377–377. 1 indexed citations
8.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1995). The Mathematical Judge: A Fable. College Mathematics Journal. 26(5). 377–381. 1 indexed citations
9.
Eisen, Richard N., et al.. (1993). Renal Failure and Severe Hypokalemia Associated With Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 22(3). 462–467. 21 indexed citations
10.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1993). The Hamming metric in genetic algorithms and its application to two network problems. 126–130. 9 indexed citations
11.
Frederick, William G., R Enríquez, & Michael Bookbinder. (1990). Peripheral Neuropathy Associated With  1-Antitrypsin Deficiency. Archives of Neurology. 47(2). 233–235. 8 indexed citations
12.
Brophy, Colleen M., et al.. (1988). Focal Segmental Ischemia of the Terminal Ileum Mimicking Crohnʼs Disease. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 10(3). 343–347. 2 indexed citations
13.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1986). An instructional environment for programming using the Vax 11 with a three-colorprojector. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 18(2). 29–30. 1 indexed citations
14.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1985). Introductory computer science courses for in-service elementary and secondary teachers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 17(1). 211–214. 1 indexed citations
15.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1984). A user-friendly shell and text editor for Pascal on the DEC VAX 11. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 16(1). 77–83. 1 indexed citations
16.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1984). A user-friendly shell and text editor for Pascal on the DEC VAX 11. 77–83. 1 indexed citations
17.
MacCallum, Donald K., et al.. (1982). Bovine corneal endothelium in vitro. Experimental Cell Research. 139(1). 1–13. 81 indexed citations
18.
Frederick, William G., C. W. Searle, & Michael Hoch. (1974). The Magnetic Properties of Single Crystal. 1197–1201. 2 indexed citations
19.
Frederick, William G., et al.. (1974). Some superconducting properties of multifilamentary niobium carbonitride. Journal of Applied Physics. 45(3). 1382–1384. 5 indexed citations
20.
Searle, C. W., William G. Frederick, H. J. Garrett, et al.. (1973). A Wall, Pinning Model for the Coercive Force in Multidomain Single Crystal (Rare Earth) Co5 Alloys. AIP conference proceedings. 573–577. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026