Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
THE DOMINANT ROLE OF THE LIVER IN PLASMA PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
1951675 citationsL. L. Miller, C. G. Bly et al.The Journal of Experimental Medicineprofile →
SYNTHESIS OF ALL PLASMA PROTEIN FRACTIONS EXCEPT GAMMA GLOBULINS BY THE LIVER
1954262 citationsLeon L. Miller, William F. BaleThe Journal of Experimental Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Bale
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Bale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Bale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Bale more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Bale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Bale. The network helps show where William F. Bale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Bale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Bale.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Bale based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Bale. William F. Bale is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
O'Connor, Stephen W. & William F. Bale. (1984). Accessibility of circulating immunoglobulin G to the extravascular compartment of solid rat tumors.. PubMed. 44(9). 3719–23.90 indexed citations
Bale, William F., et al.. (1980). Factors influencing localization of labeled antibodies in tumors.. PubMed. 40(8 Pt 2). 2965–72.38 indexed citations
5.
Izzo, Mary Jane & William F. Bale. (1976). Preferential localization and rate of loss of labeled alloantibody from rat tumors and skin transplants carrying the corresponding alloantigen.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 36(8). 2868–73.11 indexed citations
Spar, Irving L., William F. Bale, Ruth L. Goodland, & Giovanni Di Chiro. (1963). Preparation of purified I-131 labeled antisera to human fibrinogen. Preliminary studies in tumor patients.. PubMed. 19. 197–200.8 indexed citations
10.
Helmkamp, R. W., et al.. (1960). High specific activity iodination of gamma-globulin with iodine-131 monochloride.. PubMed. 20. 1–1500.303 indexed citations
11.
Spar, Irving L., William F. Bale, Ruth L. Goodland, George W. Casarett, & Sol M. Michaelson. (1960). Distribution of injected I 131 labeled antibody to dog fibrin in tumor-bearing dogs.. PubMed. UR-569. 1–13.24 indexed citations
Miller, Leon L. & William F. Bale. (1954). SYNTHESIS OF ALL PLASMA PROTEIN FRACTIONS EXCEPT GAMMA GLOBULINS BY THE LIVER. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 99(2). 125–132.262 indexed citations breakdown →
Miller, L. L., C. G. Bly, Michael L. Watson, & William F. Bale. (1951). THE DOMINANT ROLE OF THE LIVER IN PLASMA PROTEIN SYNTHESIS. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 94(5). 431–453.675 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.