William D. Stuart
- Geophysics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Mechanics of Materials top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Co-authors
- G. MavkoT. E. TullisThomas G. HildenbrandR. O. BurfordSandra S. SchulzRalph J. ArchuletaA. G. LindhRobert W. Simpson
- Topics
- earthquake and tectonic studies (22 papers)High-pressure geophysics and materials (12 papers)Geological and Geochemical Analysis (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
William D. Stuart
25 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Geophysics 853
- Artificial Intelligence 143
- Mechanics of Materials 100
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 38
- Civil and Structural Engineering 33
Countries citing papers authored by William D. Stuart
This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Stuart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Stuart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Stuart. The network helps show where William D. Stuart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William D. Stuart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William D. Stuart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William D. Stuart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William D. Stuart. William D. Stuart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 63 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Intermediate-term earthquake prediction | 1 |
| 8 | 110 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | A model to calculate EM fields in tropospheric duct environments at frequencies through SHF | 3 |
| 16 | 81 | |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About William D. Stuart
William D. Stuart is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 25 papers that have together received 897 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include earthquake and tectonic studies (22 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (12 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (853 citations), Artificial Intelligence (143 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (100 citations). William D. Stuart has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include G. Mavko, T. E. Tullis, Thomas G. Hildenbrand, R. O. Burford, Sandra S. Schulz, Ralph J. Archuleta, A. G. Lindh, Robert W. Simpson, Gutuan Zheng and J. R. Rice. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.