William D. Payne

449 total citations
10 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

William D. Payne is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation and Hepatology. According to data from OpenAlex, William D. Payne has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Transplantation and 5 papers in Hepatology. Recurrent topics in William D. Payne's work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (9 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (5 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers). William D. Payne is often cited by papers focused on Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (9 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (5 papers) and Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers). William D. Payne collaborates with scholars based in United States. William D. Payne's co-authors include Ramcharan Thiagarajan, David L. Dunn, Kristen J. Gillingham, David E. R. Sutherland, Arthur J. Matas, John S. Najarian, Timothy D. Sielaff, A. Humar, John R. Lake and Rainer W.G. Gruessner and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Radiology and Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

William D. Payne

10 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William D. Payne United States 9 242 208 120 113 61 10 346
M Ishitani United States 6 173 0.7× 235 1.1× 93 0.8× 47 0.4× 75 1.2× 11 387
Ali A. Ayoub Brazil 12 280 1.2× 55 0.3× 202 1.7× 49 0.4× 34 0.6× 19 370
F. Di Giambattista France 7 208 0.9× 302 1.5× 76 0.6× 38 0.3× 79 1.3× 13 376
A. Humar United States 7 255 1.1× 263 1.3× 14 0.1× 98 0.9× 55 0.9× 11 389
António Castro‐Henriques Portugal 13 179 0.7× 264 1.3× 28 0.2× 111 1.0× 20 0.3× 26 344
F. Bayle France 4 108 0.4× 193 0.9× 10 0.1× 74 0.7× 26 0.4× 6 243
P. Gombos Germany 8 172 0.7× 228 1.1× 16 0.1× 55 0.5× 14 0.2× 10 289
Freddy Mboti Belgium 6 137 0.6× 94 0.5× 28 0.2× 54 0.5× 13 0.2× 11 181
Pedro Nunes Portugal 13 159 0.7× 174 0.8× 22 0.2× 174 1.5× 26 0.4× 38 372
Lam Chin Tan United Kingdom 10 164 0.7× 254 1.2× 16 0.1× 69 0.6× 15 0.2× 20 337

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Payne. The network helps show where William D. Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William D. Payne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William D. Payne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William D. Payne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William D. Payne. William D. Payne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Thiagarajan, Ramcharan, et al.. (2001). Split Liver Transplantation for Two Adult Recipients: An Initial Experience. American Journal of Transplantation. 1(4). 366–372. 73 indexed citations
2.
Matas, Arthur J., Ramcharan Thiagarajan, Steven Paraskevas, et al.. (2001). Rapid Discontinuation of Steroids in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Pilot Study. American Journal of Transplantation. 1(3). 278–283. 96 indexed citations
3.
Payne, William D., et al.. (2000). CLINICAL DETERMINANTS OF MULTIPLE ACUTE REJECTION EPISODES IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS1. Transplantation. 69(11). 2357–2360. 48 indexed citations
4.
Matas, Arthur J., William D. Payne, Kristen J. Gillingham, et al.. (1999). Decreased Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Associated with Decreased Chronic Rejection. Annals of Surgery. 230(4). 493–493. 45 indexed citations
5.
Humar, A., Eric M. Johnson, William D. Payne, et al.. (1998). The acutely ischemic extremity after kidney transplant: An approach to management. Surgery. 123(3). 344–350. 12 indexed citations
6.
Yedlicka, Joseph W., John Halloran, William D. Payne, et al.. (1991). Angiogenesis after Hepatic Arterial Occlusion in Liver Transplant Patients. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2(2). 235–240. 16 indexed citations
7.
Stock, Peter G. & William D. Payne. (1990). Liver transplantation.. PubMed. 6(4). 911–26. 5 indexed citations
8.
Letourneau, J G, David W. Hunter, Nancy L. Ascher, et al.. (1989). Biliary complications after liver transplantation in children.. Radiology. 170(3). 1095–1099. 24 indexed citations
9.
Fischel, Richard, N. L. Ascher, William D. Payne, et al.. (1989). Pediatric liver transplantation across ABO blood group barriers.. PubMed. 21(1 Pt 2). 2221–2. 13 indexed citations
10.
Sutherland, David E.R., Daniel M. Canafax, Nancy L. Ascher, et al.. (1988). A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CYCLOSPORINE WITH ANTILYMPHOBLAST-GLOBULIN—AZATHIOPRINE FOR RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS. Transplantation. 45(2). 380–385. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026