William D. Boothe

584 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 373 citations indexed

About

William D. Boothe is a scholar working on Dermatology, Oncology and Immunology and Allergy. According to data from OpenAlex, William D. Boothe has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 373 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Dermatology, 3 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Immunology and Allergy. Recurrent topics in William D. Boothe's work include Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (3 papers) and Medicine and Dermatology Studies History (2 papers). William D. Boothe is often cited by papers focused on Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (3 papers) and Medicine and Dermatology Studies History (2 papers). William D. Boothe collaborates with scholars based in United States. William D. Boothe's co-authors include Michelle Tarbox, James Tarbox, Christine Lin, Kelly Bennett, Ammar Ahmed, Anokhi Jambusaria‐Pahlajani, Cloyce L. Stetson, Adewole S. Adamson, Paul J. Rathouz and Lucia Z. Diaz and has published in prestigious journals such as Advances in experimental medicine and biology, JAMA Dermatology and Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

In The Last Decade

William D. Boothe

6 papers receiving 367 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Atopic Dermatitis: Pathophysiology

2017 334 citations William D. Boothe, James Tarbox et al. Advances in experimental medicine and biology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
William D. Boothe United States	4	306	185	65	61	52	7	373
James Tarbox United States	8	299 1.0×	190 1.0×	82 1.3×	108 1.8×	90 1.7×	20	465
Mingeum Jeong United States	6	294 1.0×	174 0.9×	89 1.4×	96 1.6×	60 1.2×	10	438
Takanori Sengoku Japan	10	231 0.8×	123 0.7×	68 1.0×	73 1.2×	56 1.1×	14	405
Kenshiro Matsuda Japan	7	196 0.6×	109 0.6×	56 0.9×	70 1.1×	44 0.8×	17	296
Hideki Kitagaki Japan	6	347 1.1×	180 1.0×	140 2.2×	155 2.5×	71 1.4×	6	484
Steven King Fan Loo Hong Kong	13	228 0.7×	82 0.4×	46 0.7×	89 1.5×	69 1.3×	24	393
Alan Clucas France	10	373 1.2×	138 0.7×	73 1.1×	61 1.0×	69 1.3×	13	476
Akiko Takaoka Japan	9	250 0.8×	140 0.8×	170 2.6×	189 3.1×	88 1.7×	18	486
Takuya Furuhashi Japan	9	207 0.7×	71 0.4×	41 0.6×	154 2.5×	30 0.6×	20	338
Jowita Sroka-Tomaszewska Poland	1	256 0.8×	135 0.7×	62 1.0×	58 1.0×	40 0.8×	3	312

Countries citing papers authored by William D. Boothe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William D. Boothe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William D. Boothe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William D. Boothe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William D. Boothe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William D. Boothe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William D. Boothe. The network helps show where William D. Boothe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William D. Boothe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William D. Boothe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William D. Boothe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William D. Boothe. William D. Boothe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Boothe, William D., James Tarbox, & Michelle Tarbox. (2024). Atopic Dermatitis: Pathophysiology. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1447. 21–35. 11 indexed citations

2.

Boothe, William D., et al.. (2022). Association of Tumor Characteristics With Insurance Type Among Patients Undergoing Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. JAMA Dermatology. 158(8). 919–919. 3 indexed citations

3.

Boothe, William D., et al.. (2021). Assessment of teledermatology education during residency training: a nationwide survey of residents and program directors. Dermatology Online Journal. 27(4). 1 indexed citations

4.

Boothe, William D., et al.. (2020). Seborrheic dermatitis with massive facial hyperkeratosis resembling acquired ichthyosis. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings. 33(4). 594–595.

5.

Lin, Christine, et al.. (2020). Value of Dermatology Nights at a student-run free clinic. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings. 34(2). 260–261. 6 indexed citations

6.

Boothe, William D., et al.. (2019). SOX‐10 staining in dermal scars. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 46(8). 579–585. 18 indexed citations

7.

Boothe, William D., James Tarbox, & Michelle Tarbox. (2017). Atopic Dermatitis: Pathophysiology. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1027. 21–37. 334 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact