William Chan

5.5k total citations
123 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

William Chan is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, William Chan has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 71 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 53 papers in Surgery and 42 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in William Chan's work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (46 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (32 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (29 papers). William Chan is often cited by papers focused on Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (46 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (32 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (29 papers). William Chan collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. William Chan's co-authors include Jonathan H. Sunshine, Stephen J. Duffy, Anthony M. Dart, Kitt Shaffer, Cynthia Deitch, Hamid Ikram, Dion Stub, Angela Brennan, Christopher M. Reid and Andrew E. Ajani and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Radiology.

In The Last Decade

William Chan

112 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Chan Australia 25 862 562 470 279 226 123 1.9k
James Dove United States 24 1.5k 1.7× 652 1.2× 1.4k 3.0× 193 0.7× 91 0.4× 119 2.8k
F. Daniel Ramirez Canada 26 1.2k 1.4× 118 0.2× 411 0.9× 134 0.5× 166 0.7× 113 2.1k
Jennifer A. Rymer United States 22 1.0k 1.2× 252 0.4× 629 1.3× 62 0.2× 44 0.2× 100 1.7k
Jeffrey B. Geske United States 33 3.4k 3.9× 329 0.6× 810 1.7× 108 0.4× 168 0.7× 203 4.1k
Lori A. Blauwet United States 24 2.7k 3.2× 436 0.8× 1.1k 2.3× 56 0.2× 144 0.6× 64 3.6k
Pietro Di Santo Canada 18 401 0.5× 88 0.2× 489 1.0× 398 1.4× 426 1.9× 67 1.2k
Kjell Nikus Finland 31 2.3k 2.6× 842 1.5× 310 0.7× 87 0.3× 127 0.6× 208 2.7k
Santosh Sutradhar United States 16 1.3k 1.5× 89 0.2× 381 0.8× 96 0.3× 274 1.2× 47 2.1k
Josepa Mauri Spain 20 1.1k 1.3× 410 0.7× 997 2.1× 37 0.1× 156 0.7× 97 1.7k
Peter Rosseel Netherlands 21 459 0.5× 60 0.1× 384 0.8× 139 0.5× 87 0.4× 48 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by William Chan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Chan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Chan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Chan. The network helps show where William Chan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Chan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Chan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Chan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Chan. William Chan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vogrin, Sara, Jiwon Kim, Diem Dinh, et al.. (2025). Effect of Cardiac Surgery Availability and Institutional Procedural Volume on Clinical Outcomes Following Complex, High‐Risk, and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 106(7). 3969–3981.
2.
3.
Chan, William, et al.. (2025). Will Dynamic Evaluation of Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning Models Lead to Improved Survival?. Heart Lung and Circulation. 35(1). 12–30.
5.
D’Elia, Nicholas, Sara Vogrin, Angela Brennan, et al.. (2024). Electrocardiographic patterns and clinical outcomes of acute coronary syndrome cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention — A propensity score analysis. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine. 65. 58–64. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bloom, Jason, E. Paratz, L. Dawson, et al.. (2024). Healthcare and economic cost burden of emergency medical services treated non-traumatic shock using a population-based cohort in Victoria, Australia. BMJ Open. 14(4). e078435–e078435. 2 indexed citations
7.
Dawson, L., Muhammad Rashid, Diem Dinh, et al.. (2024). No-Reflow Prediction in Acute Coronary Syndrome During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The NORPACS Risk Score. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions. 17(4). e013738–e013738. 8 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Rosanne, Dan Garrette, Chitwan Saharia, et al.. (2023). Character-Aware Models Improve Visual Text Rendering. 16270–16297. 11 indexed citations
9.
Noaman, Samer, R. Batchelor, Jason Bloom, et al.. (2023). Clinical Features and Outcomes Among Patients With Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and an Initial Shockable Rhythm. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions. 16(10). e013007–e013007. 2 indexed citations
11.
Bloom, Jason, William Chan, David M. Kaye, & Dion Stub. (2023). State of Shock: Contemporary Vasopressor and Inotrope Use in Cardiogenic Shock. Journal of the American Heart Association. 12(15). e029787–e029787. 28 indexed citations
12.
Dinh, Diem, Samer Noaman, Jason Bloom, et al.. (2023). Effect of Concomitant Cardiac Arrest on Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome-Related Cardiogenic Shock. The American Journal of Cardiology. 204. 104–114. 3 indexed citations
13.
Vogrin, Sara, Samer Noaman, Simon Lam, et al.. (2022). Effect of Different Anthropometric Body Indexes on Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterisation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Tomography. 8(5). 2256–2267. 2 indexed citations
14.
Noaman, Samer, R. Batchelor, Laura C. Hanson, et al.. (2022). Sex differences among patients presenting to hospital with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest and shockable rhythm. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 35(2). 297–305. 1 indexed citations
15.
Vogrin, Sara, Angela Brennan, Samer Noaman, et al.. (2022). Adverse Impact of Peri-Procedural Stroke in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology. 181. 18–24. 1 indexed citations
16.
Bloom, Jason, Ziad Nehme, Emily Andrew, et al.. (2022). HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK. Shock. 58(3). 204–210. 11 indexed citations
17.
Wong, Nathan D, Diem Dinh, Angela Brennan, et al.. (2022). Incidence, predictors and clinical implications of new renal impairment following percutaneous coronary intervention. Open Heart. 9(2). e001876–e001876. 2 indexed citations
18.
Batchelor, R., Diem Dinh, Angela Brennan, et al.. (2020). Relation of Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Outcomes in Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 136. 15–23. 5 indexed citations
20.
Noaman, Samer, Sara Vogrin, Angela Brennan, et al.. (2018). Comparison of short‐term clinical outcomes of proximal versus nonproximal lesion location in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: The PROXIMITI study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 93(1). 32–40. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026