Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Studies in Econometric Method
1954164 citationsErvin K. Zingler, William C. Hood et al.Southern Economic Journalprofile →
Citations per year, relative to William C. Hood William C. Hood (= 1×)
peers
Mauro Bernardi
Countries citing papers authored by William C. Hood
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William C. Hood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William C. Hood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William C. Hood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William C. Hood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William C. Hood. The network helps show where William C. Hood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William C. Hood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William C. Hood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William C. Hood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William C. Hood. William C. Hood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kerber, Laura, et al.. (2018). Polygonal Ridge Networks in Arabia Terra, Nili Fossae and Nilosyrtis: Potential Implications for Mars 2020 Landing Site Selection. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2018.1 indexed citations
Aslan, Andres, et al.. (2005). Geological History of the Uncompahgre Plateau and Unaweep Canyon – Day 1 Guidebook. 1–46.1 indexed citations
7.
Hood, William C.. (1989). The Imperfect Spy. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence. 3(2). 271–276.2 indexed citations
8.
Hood, William C., et al.. (1984). Leaching column method for predicting effluent quality from surface mines.3 indexed citations
9.
Hood, William C., et al.. (1984). Effects of anaerobically digested sludge on the oxidation of pyrite and the formation of acid mine drainage.2 indexed citations
Hood, William C.. (1968). An x-ray background method for the determination of total iron in trioctahedral micas. American Mineralogist. 53. 1054–1056.1 indexed citations
16.
Hood, William C., et al.. (1967). Mass Magnetic Susceptibilities of some Trioctahedral Micas. American Mineralogist. 52. 1643–1648.7 indexed citations
17.
Hood, William C.. (1962). Unusual crystal groups from greene county, Missouri. American Mineralogist. 47. 1000–1001.4 indexed citations
Arrow, Kenneth J., William C. Hood, & Tjalling C. Koopmans. (1954). Studies in Econometric Method.. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 49(267). 660–660.87 indexed citations
20.
Zingler, Ervin K., William C. Hood, & Tjalling C. Koopmans. (1954). Studies in Econometric Method. Southern Economic Journal. 20(4). 400–400.164 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.