William Brackett

2.4k total citations
81 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

William Brackett is a scholar working on Orthodontics, Oral Surgery and General Dentistry. According to data from OpenAlex, William Brackett has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 68 papers in Orthodontics, 31 papers in Oral Surgery and 25 papers in General Dentistry. Recurrent topics in William Brackett's work include Dental materials and restorations (65 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (25 papers) and Dental Erosion and Treatment (25 papers). William Brackett is often cited by papers focused on Dental materials and restorations (65 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (25 papers) and Dental Erosion and Treatment (25 papers). William Brackett collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Japan. William Brackett's co-authors include M. G. Brackett, Franklin R. Tay, William D. Browning, David H. Pashley, David Covey, Shuichi Ito, D.H. Pashley, D.H. Pashley, H. A. St Germain and Masanori Hashimoto and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Dental Research, Journal of Endodontics and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.

In The Last Decade

William Brackett

78 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Brackett United States 24 1.6k 1.0k 535 137 92 81 1.8k
Ros C. Randall United Kingdom 15 1.2k 0.7× 797 0.8× 432 0.8× 237 1.7× 107 1.2× 23 1.4k
Viviane Hass Brazil 23 1.8k 1.1× 913 0.9× 480 0.9× 183 1.3× 90 1.0× 67 2.0k
Ana Raquel Benetti Denmark 23 1.4k 0.8× 957 0.9× 420 0.8× 227 1.7× 53 0.6× 56 1.7k
DH Pashley United States 21 1.9k 1.1× 1.3k 1.3× 467 0.9× 147 1.1× 126 1.4× 40 2.1k
Issis Luque-Martínez Brazil 21 1.5k 0.9× 729 0.7× 425 0.8× 143 1.0× 96 1.0× 27 1.6k
Miguel Angel Muñoz Brazil 18 1.4k 0.8× 657 0.6× 445 0.8× 120 0.9× 89 1.0× 24 1.4k
Giulio Marchesi Italy 17 1.1k 0.7× 665 0.6× 336 0.6× 76 0.6× 73 0.8× 36 1.3k
Luiz Clóvis Cardoso Vieira Brazil 24 1.5k 0.9× 970 0.9× 402 0.8× 245 1.8× 68 0.7× 48 1.6k
Kumiko Yoshihara Belgium 12 2.2k 1.3× 1.2k 1.2× 709 1.3× 90 0.7× 176 1.9× 18 2.3k
Aldridge D. Wilder United States 23 1.4k 0.9× 696 0.7× 381 0.7× 114 0.8× 91 1.0× 37 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by William Brackett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Brackett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Brackett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Brackett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Brackett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Brackett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Brackett. The network helps show where William Brackett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Brackett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Brackett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Brackett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Brackett. William Brackett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2024). A novel simplified method for assessing crystal length and crystalline content in dental ceramics. Microscopy Research and Technique. 88(1). 224–233.
2.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2024). Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A Brief Review for Clinicians. Operative Dentistry. 49(6). 665–672. 1 indexed citations
3.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2018). Minimally invasive esthetic improvement in a patient with dental fluorosis by using microabrasion and bleaching: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 120(3). 323–326. 10 indexed citations
4.
Brackett, M. G., William Brackett, Li‐na Niu, et al.. (2011). The critical barrier to progress in dentine bonding with the etch-and-rinse technique. Journal of Dentistry. 39(3). 238–248. 101 indexed citations
5.
Brackett, M. G., et al.. (2010). Two-Year Clinical Performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in Restoration of Unabraded Non-carious Class V Lesions. Operative Dentistry. 35(3). 273–278. 33 indexed citations
6.
Browning, William D., Rosalía Contreras‐Bulnes, M. G. Brackett, & William Brackett. (2009). Color differences: Polymerized composite and corresponding Vitapan Classical shade tab. Journal of Dentistry. 37. e34–e39. 51 indexed citations
7.
Brackett, M. G., et al.. (2009). Minimally Retentive Gold Onlays: A Six-Year Case Report. Operative Dentistry. 34(3). 352–355. 4 indexed citations
8.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2008). The Effect of Subject Age on the Microtensile Bond Strengths of a Resin and a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive to Tooth Structure. Operative Dentistry. 33(3). 282–286. 13 indexed citations
9.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2008). Microtensile Dentin and Enamel Bond Strengths of Recent Self-etching Resins. Operative Dentistry. 33(1). 89–95. 44 indexed citations
10.
Brackett, William, William D. Browning, M. G. Brackett, Richard S. Callan, & John S. Blalock. (2007). Effect of Restoration Size on the Clinical Performance of Posterior “Packable” Resin Composites Over 18 Months. Operative Dentistry. 32(3). 212–216. 18 indexed citations
11.
Browning, William D., et al.. (2007). Postoperative Sensitivity: A Comparison of Two Bonding Agents. Operative Dentistry. 32(2). 112–117. 17 indexed citations
12.
Brackett, M. G., William Brackett, William D. Browning, & Frederick A. Rueggeberg. (2007). The Effect of Light Curing Source on the Residual Yellowing of Resin Composites. Operative Dentistry. 32(5). 443–450. 23 indexed citations
13.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2004). The effect of elevated temperatures on the dentin adhesion of resin composites.. PubMed. 28(3). 303–6. 1 indexed citations
14.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2002). One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.. PubMed. 27(2). 112–6. 47 indexed citations
15.
Brackett, William, et al.. (2002). The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: A pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 87(6). 625–627. 29 indexed citations
16.
Brackett, William, et al.. (1998). Microleakage of Class V compomer and light-cured glass ionomer restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 79(3). 261–263. 31 indexed citations
17.
Brackett, William, et al.. (1994). Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 8 years in a general practice. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 71(1). 13–15. 16 indexed citations
18.
Brackett, William, et al.. (1994). The influence of mixing temperature and powder/liquid ratio on the film thickness of three glass-ionomer cements.. PubMed. 7(1). 13–6. 4 indexed citations
19.
Brackett, William, et al.. (1992). Performance of a glass ionomer luting cement over 5 years in a general practice. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 67(1). 59–61. 12 indexed citations
20.
Brackett, William & William M. Johnston. (1989). Repair of glass ionomer restorative materials: Flexure strength of specimens repaired by two methods. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 62(3). 261–264. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026