Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A random graph model for massive graphs
2000542 citationsWilliam Aiello, Fan Chung et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William Aiello
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William Aiello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Aiello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Aiello more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Aiello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Aiello. The network helps show where William Aiello may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Aiello
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Aiello.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Aiello based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Aiello. William Aiello is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nanavati, Mihir, et al.. (2011). Herbert west: deanonymizer. 6–6.11 indexed citations
Aiello, William, Andrei Broder, Jeannette Janssen, & Evangelos Milios. (2007). Algorithms and Models for the Web-Graph: Fourth International Workshop, WAW 2006, Banff, Canada, November 30 - December 1, 2006. Revised Papers. Springer eBooks.2 indexed citations
4.
Enck, William, Patrick McDaniel, Subhabrata Sen, et al.. (2007). Configuration management at massive scale: system design and experience. 6.35 indexed citations
5.
McDaniel, Patrick, Subhabrata Sen, Oliver Spatscheck, et al.. (2006). Enterprise Security: A Community of Interest Based Approach.. Network and Distributed System Security Symposium.46 indexed citations
Aiello, William, et al.. (2003). Working around BGP: An Incremental Approach to Improving Security and Accuracy in Interdomain Routing.. UCL Discovery (University College London).145 indexed citations
10.
Aiello, William & Steven M. Bellovin. (2002). Just Fast Keying (JFK). 1(4962). 340–1.12 indexed citations
Aiello, William, Sandeep Bhatt, Fan Chung, Arnold L. Rosenberg, & Ramesh K. Sitaraman. (2001). Augmented ring networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. 12(6). 598–609.
13.
Aiello, William, Costas Busch, Maurice Herlihy, et al.. (2000). Supporting Increment and Decrement Operations in Balancing Networks.. 2000.3 indexed citations
Aiello, William & Ramarathnam Venkatesan. (1996). Foiling birthday attacks in length-doubling transformations: benes: a non-reversible alternative to feistel. 307–320.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.