Wesley Peck

697 total citations
30 papers, 515 citations indexed

About

Wesley Peck is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Wesley Peck has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 515 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Environmental Engineering, 11 papers in Ocean Engineering and 9 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Wesley Peck's work include CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (23 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (9 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (9 papers). Wesley Peck is often cited by papers focused on CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (23 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (9 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (9 papers). Wesley Peck collaborates with scholars based in United States, Indonesia and Sweden. Wesley Peck's co-authors include Charles D. Gorecki, Nicholas A. Azzolina, Scott C. Ayash, David V. Nakles, L. Stephen Melzer, John Hamling, Grant Bromhal, Robert Dilmore, Angela Goodman and Scott M. Frailey and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, International journal of greenhouse gas control and Minerals.

In The Last Decade

Wesley Peck

29 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wesley Peck United States 11 358 249 211 167 82 30 515
Vanessa Núñez-López United States 12 413 1.2× 293 1.2× 291 1.4× 139 0.8× 72 0.9× 27 603
John Hamling United States 13 213 0.6× 280 1.1× 216 1.0× 169 1.0× 44 0.5× 43 468
Traci Rodosta United States 10 514 1.4× 214 0.9× 252 1.2× 197 1.2× 80 1.0× 18 596
Scott C. Ayash United States 9 241 0.7× 184 0.7× 166 0.8× 72 0.4× 52 0.6× 16 361
L. Stephen Melzer United States 10 325 0.9× 338 1.4× 237 1.1× 162 1.0× 67 0.8× 16 543
Neil Wildgust United States 8 304 0.8× 178 0.7× 209 1.0× 95 0.6× 34 0.4× 12 435
Temitope Ajayi United States 6 424 1.2× 253 1.0× 225 1.1× 131 0.8× 26 0.3× 8 546
Jorge S. Gomes United Arab Emirates 4 393 1.1× 211 0.8× 195 0.9× 122 0.7× 25 0.3× 6 493
K. Pruess United States 3 459 1.3× 184 0.7× 199 0.9× 135 0.8× 29 0.4× 3 526
Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa United States 9 214 0.6× 241 1.0× 184 0.9× 228 1.4× 48 0.6× 19 408

Countries citing papers authored by Wesley Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wesley Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wesley Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wesley Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wesley Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wesley Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wesley Peck. The network helps show where Wesley Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wesley Peck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wesley Peck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wesley Peck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wesley Peck. Wesley Peck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davydycheva, Sofia, et al.. (2023). Application of Electromagnetic Methods for Reservoir Monitoring with Emphasis on Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage. Minerals. 13(10). 1308–1308. 8 indexed citations
2.
Peck, Wesley, et al.. (2022). Toward Co2 Multimeasurement Geophysical Monitoring in the North Dakota Carbonsafe Project. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
3.
Strack, Kurt, et al.. (2022). CSEM fluid monitoring methodology using real data examples. Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy. 677–681. 2 indexed citations
4.
Singh, Harpreet, Evgeniy M. Myshakin, Angela Goodman, et al.. (2020). Methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of residual oil zones at the national and regional scale. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 96. 103006–103006. 20 indexed citations
5.
Peck, Wesley, et al.. (2019). The North Dakota integrated carbon storage complex feasibility study. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 84. 47–53. 14 indexed citations
6.
Azzolina, Nicholas A., et al.. (2018). Statistical analysis of pulsed-neutron well logs in monitoring injected carbon dioxide. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 75. 125–133.
7.
Azzolina, Nicholas A., John Hamling, Wesley Peck, et al.. (2017). A Life Cycle Analysis of Incremental Oil Produced via CO2 EOR. Energy Procedia. 114. 6588–6596. 28 indexed citations
8.
Peck, Wesley, et al.. (2017). High-level Screening for Williston Basin Residual Oil Zones Using Location-independent Data. Energy Procedia. 114. 3518–3527. 2 indexed citations
9.
Jiang, Tao, et al.. (2017). Numerical Modeling of the Aquistore CO2 Storage Project. Energy Procedia. 114. 4886–4895. 16 indexed citations
10.
Bosshart, Nicholas W., Nicholas A. Azzolina, Scott C. Ayash, et al.. (2017). Quantifying the effects of depositional environment on deep saline formation co2 storage efficiency and rate. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 69. 8–19. 18 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Steven A., et al.. (2017). Relative Permeability of Williston Basin CO2 Storage Targets. Energy Procedia. 114. 2957–2971. 6 indexed citations
12.
Peck, Wesley, et al.. (2017). Best Practices for Quantifying the CO2 Storage Resource Estimates in CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery. Energy Procedia. 114. 4741–4749. 7 indexed citations
13.
Azzolina, Nicholas A., Wesley Peck, John Hamling, et al.. (2016). How green is my oil? A detailed look at greenhouse gas accounting for CO2-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) sites. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 51. 369–379. 72 indexed citations
14.
Levine, Jonathan, Daniel J. Soeder, Grant Bromhal, et al.. (2016). U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 51. 81–94. 87 indexed citations
15.
Azzolina, Nicholas A., David V. Nakles, Charles D. Gorecki, et al.. (2015). CO2 storage associated with CO2 enhanced oil recovery: A statistical analysis of historical operations. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 37. 384–397. 125 indexed citations
16.
Peck, Wesley, et al.. (2015). Identifying residual oil zones in the Williston and Powder River Basins using Basin Modeling. 1 indexed citations
17.
Liu, Guoxiang, Wesley Peck, Jason R. Braunberger, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of large-scale carbon dioxide storage potential in the basal saline system in the Alberta and Williston Basins in North America. Energy Procedia. 63. 2911–2920. 3 indexed citations
18.
Peck, Wesley, et al.. (2013). CO2 Storage Resource Potential of the Cambro-ordovician Saline System in the we Stern Interior of North America. Energy Procedia. 37. 5230–5239. 7 indexed citations
19.
Sorensen, James A., Steven A. Smith, Charles D. Gorecki, et al.. (2009). CO2 storage capacity estimates for stacked brine-saturated formations in the North Dakota portion of the Williston Basin. Energy Procedia. 1(1). 2833–2840. 3 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vanessa Núñez-López Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John Hamling Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Traci Rodosta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Scott C. Ayash Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Stephen Melzer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Neil Wildgust Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Temitope Ajayi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jorge S. Gomes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Pruess Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chantsalmaa Dalkhaa
Rankless by CCL
2026