Countries citing papers authored by Werner Scholtz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Werner Scholtz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Werner Scholtz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Werner Scholtz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Werner Scholtz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Werner Scholtz. The network helps show where Werner Scholtz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Werner Scholtz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Werner Scholtz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Werner Scholtz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Werner Scholtz. Werner Scholtz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Scholtz, Werner, et al.. (2013). Fiat Lux! Deriving a right to energy from the African charter on human and peoples' rights. 38(1). 49–66.1 indexed citations
Scholtz, Werner. (2011). Review of the role, functions and terms of reference of the SADC tribunal. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).3 indexed citations
Scholtz, Werner. (2010). The promotion of regional environmental security and Africa's common position on climate change. African Human Rights Law Journal. 10(1). 1–25.3 indexed citations
11.
Scholtz, Werner. (2009). Equity as the basis for a future international climate change agreement: Between pragmatic panacea and idealistic impediment.The optimisation of the CBDR principle via realism. Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University). 42(2). 166–182.3 indexed citations
Scholtz, Werner. (2008). Common heritage : saving the environment for humankind or exploiting resources in the name of eco-imperialism?. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 41(2). 273–293.4 indexed citations
14.
Scholtz, Werner, et al.. (2008). The interpretation of section 231 of the South African Constitution : a lost ball in the high weeds!. Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University). 41(2). 324–338.1 indexed citations
15.
Scholtz, Werner. (2008). Different countries, one environment : a critical Southern discourse on the common but differentiated responsibilities principle. Boloka Institutional Repository (North-west University). 33(1). 113–136.1 indexed citations
Scholtz, Werner. (2005). The anthropocentric approach to sustainable development in the National Environmental Management Act and the Constitution of South Africa. 2005(1). 69–85.4 indexed citations
18.
Scholtz, Werner. (2004). Introduction of environmental management co-operation agreements in South Africa. 11(1). 31–51.1 indexed citations
19.
Scholtz, Werner. (2004). A few thoughts on section 231 of the South African Constitution, Act 108 of 1996 : notes and comments. 29(1). 202–216.2 indexed citations
20.
Scholtz, Werner. (2004). Co-operative and participatory governance via the implementation of environmental management co-operation agreements. 11(2). 183–194.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.