Wen-Pin Lien

59 total papers · 996 total citations
40 papers, 750 citations indexed

About

Wen-Pin Lien is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Wen-Pin Lien has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 750 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 12 papers in Surgery and 9 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Wen-Pin Lien's work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (11 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (8 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (8 papers). Wen-Pin Lien is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (11 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (8 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (8 papers). Wen-Pin Lien collaborates with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Wen-Pin Lien's co-authors include Juey‐Jen Hwang, Peiliang Kuan, Jin‐Jer Chen, Yüng-Zu Tseng, Shu‐Hsun Chu, Kou‐Gi Shyu, Yuan‐Teh Lee, Chi‐Ren Hung, Chang‐Her Tsai and Shoei‐Shen Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

In The Last Decade

Wen-Pin Lien

38 papers receiving 692 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Wen-Pin Lien 448 281 247 202 59 40 750
Edit Nagy 464 1.0× 284 1.0× 301 1.2× 199 1.0× 27 0.5× 30 760
Marvin D. Peyton 396 0.9× 250 0.9× 166 0.7× 224 1.1× 15 0.3× 39 696
W. P. Klövekorn 478 1.1× 123 0.4× 146 0.6× 231 1.1× 92 1.6× 37 869
Henrik Bjursten 434 1.0× 182 0.6× 171 0.7× 200 1.0× 83 1.4× 57 817
Peter Haldenwang 526 1.2× 256 0.9× 160 0.6× 245 1.2× 35 0.6× 58 705
Yousef Rezaei 337 0.8× 203 0.7× 170 0.7× 172 0.9× 35 0.6× 66 747
William H. Plauth 375 0.8× 348 1.2× 355 1.4× 256 1.3× 20 0.3× 26 763
Mao Chen 590 1.3× 271 1.0× 337 1.4× 138 0.7× 19 0.3× 62 751
Pierre Wauthy 510 1.1× 554 2.0× 250 1.0× 218 1.1× 33 0.6× 36 810
Hanghang Wang 288 0.6× 387 1.4× 116 0.5× 200 1.0× 28 0.5× 50 775

Countries citing papers authored by Wen-Pin Lien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wen-Pin Lien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wen-Pin Lien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wen-Pin Lien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wen-Pin Lien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wen-Pin Lien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wen-Pin Lien. The network helps show where Wen-Pin Lien may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wen-Pin Lien

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wen-Pin Lien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wen-Pin Lien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wen-Pin Lien. Wen-Pin Lien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026