W.B. Schoolcraft

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

W.B. Schoolcraft is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, W.B. Schoolcraft has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 15 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 12 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in W.B. Schoolcraft's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (19 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (13 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (7 papers). W.B. Schoolcraft is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (19 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (13 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (7 papers). W.B. Schoolcraft collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. W.B. Schoolcraft's co-authors include David K. Gardner, J. Stevens, Lyla Wagley, Terry Schlenker, John S. Hesla, Eric S. Surrey, M. Katz-Jaffe, M. Katz-Jaffe, Rebecca L. Krisher and E. Fragouli and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive BioMedicine Online.

In The Last Decade

W.B. Schoolcraft

33 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and ... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W.B. Schoolcraft United States 11 948 813 696 269 154 34 1.3k
Montserrat Boada Spain 20 669 0.7× 585 0.7× 522 0.8× 209 0.8× 125 0.8× 60 1.0k
Inge Agerholm Denmark 19 1.3k 1.4× 831 1.0× 821 1.2× 494 1.8× 176 1.1× 34 1.6k
Helmy Selman Italy 20 874 0.9× 361 0.4× 899 1.3× 199 0.7× 93 0.6× 34 1.1k
K.M. Upham United States 12 1.1k 1.2× 1.6k 2.0× 642 0.9× 399 1.5× 380 2.5× 21 2.0k
John S. Hesla United States 13 644 0.7× 494 0.6× 628 0.9× 126 0.5× 70 0.5× 22 1.1k
Giles Tomkin United States 11 1.0k 1.1× 1.0k 1.2× 601 0.9× 413 1.5× 272 1.8× 15 1.5k
J. Remohı́ Spain 11 842 0.9× 397 0.5× 885 1.3× 131 0.5× 87 0.6× 19 1.1k
M.J. Glassner United States 10 460 0.5× 484 0.6× 293 0.4× 133 0.5× 161 1.0× 29 788
Andrew Dorfmann United States 14 387 0.4× 677 0.8× 313 0.4× 166 0.6× 425 2.8× 30 1.1k
K.M. Ferry United States 11 722 0.8× 1.2k 1.4× 364 0.5× 280 1.0× 324 2.1× 25 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by W.B. Schoolcraft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.B. Schoolcraft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.B. Schoolcraft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.B. Schoolcraft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.B. Schoolcraft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.B. Schoolcraft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.B. Schoolcraft. The network helps show where W.B. Schoolcraft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.B. Schoolcraft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.B. Schoolcraft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.B. Schoolcraft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.B. Schoolcraft. W.B. Schoolcraft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McGarvey, Michael J., et al.. (2018). Infertility patients with chromosome inversions are not susceptible to an inter-chromosomal effect. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 36(3). 509–516. 23 indexed citations
2.
Katz-Jaffe, M., et al.. (2018). Chromosomal mosaicism is impacted by compromised embryo culture conditions. Fertility and Sterility. 110(4). e431–e431. 9 indexed citations
3.
Chitwood, James, et al.. (2017). Differing molecular response of young and advanced maternal age human oocytes to IVM. Human Reproduction. 32(11). 2199–2208. 46 indexed citations
4.
McCallie, Blair R., et al.. (2017). Disrupted sperm mirna expression profiles revealed a fingerprint of impaired spermatogenesis in oligozoospermia males. Fertility and Sterility. 108(3). e139–e139. 4 indexed citations
5.
Krisher, Rebecca L., et al.. (2015). Comparison of a benchtop incubator and a time lapse incubator for culture of human embryos: impact of culture dish. Fertility and Sterility. 104(3). e23–e23. 1 indexed citations
7.
Forman, Eric J., Nathan R. Treff, J. Stevens, et al.. (2012). Embryos whose polar bodies contain isolated reciprocal chromosome aneuploidy are almost always euploid. Human Reproduction. 28(2). 502–508. 27 indexed citations
8.
Katz‐Jaffe, Mandy G., et al.. (2010). Blastocysts from patients with polycystic ovaries exhibit altered transcriptome and secretome. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 21(4). 520–526. 8 indexed citations
9.
Munné, S., E. Fragouli, P. Colls, et al.. (2009). Improved detection of aneuploid blastocysts using a new 12-chromosome FISH test. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 20(1). 92–97. 39 indexed citations
10.
Wells, David N., et al.. (2009). Increased embryo implantation and high birth rates following comprehensive chromosomal screening of in-vitro fertilized embryos. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 18. S–10. 5 indexed citations
11.
Fragouli, E., et al.. (2009). Comprehensive cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 18. S–9. 1 indexed citations
12.
Wells, Dagan, E. Fragouli, J. Stevens, et al.. (2008). High pregnancy rate after comprehensive chromosomal screening of blastocysts. Fertility and Sterility. 90. S80–S80. 9 indexed citations
13.
Sheehan, C., M. Katz-Jaffe, W.B. Schoolcraft, & David K. Gardner. (2006). P-685. Fertility and Sterility. 86(3). S387–S387. 3 indexed citations
14.
Munné, S., J. Fischer, Jacques Cohen, et al.. (2005). O▪37 Results of PGD for infertility in 3597 cycles. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 10. 12–13.
15.
Gardner, David K., et al.. (2004). THE SPERM CHROMATIN STRUCTURE ASSAY (SCSA) AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO IVF OUTCOME. 60TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, PHILADELPHIA, PA.. 82. 1 indexed citations
16.
Surrey, Eric S. & W.B. Schoolcraft. (2001). Laparoscopic management of hydrosalpinges before in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer: salpingectomy versus proximal tubal occlusion. Fertility and Sterility. 75(3). 612–617. 59 indexed citations
17.
Schoolcraft, W.B. & David K. Gardner. (2001). Blastocyst Versus Day 2 or 3 Transfer. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 19(3). 259–268. 32 indexed citations
18.
Glass, Karen, et al.. (2000). Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Cervical Irrigation at the Time of Embryo Transfer. Fertility and Sterility. 74(3). S31–S31. 14 indexed citations
19.
Gardner, David K., W.B. Schoolcraft, Lyla Wagley, et al.. (1998). A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in- vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction. 13(12). 3434–3440. 545 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Gardner, David K. & W.B. Schoolcraft. (1998). No longer neglected: the human blastocyst. Human Reproduction. 13(12). 3289–3292. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026