Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
20091.6k citationsStephen R. Carpenter, Harold A. Mooney et al.profile →
Ecological Forecasts: An Emerging Imperative
2001699 citationsJames S. Clark, S. R. Carpenter et al.Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Walter V. Reid
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Walter V. Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Walter V. Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Walter V. Reid more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Walter V. Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Walter V. Reid. The network helps show where Walter V. Reid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Walter V. Reid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Walter V. Reid.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Walter V. Reid based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Walter V. Reid. Walter V. Reid is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reid, Walter V., Mariam Ali, & Christopher B. Field. (2019). The future of bioenergy. Global Change Biology. 26(1). 274–286.187 indexed citations
Reid, Walter V., Fikret Berkes, Thomas J. Wilbanks, & D. Capistrano. (2006). Bridging scales and knowledge systems: concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment.210 indexed citations
Clark, James S., S. R. Carpenter, M. Craig Barber, et al.. (2001). Ecological Forecasts: An Emerging Imperative. Science. 293(5530). 657–660.699 indexed citations breakdown →
Laird, Sarah A, Carissa J. Klein, Walter V. Reid, et al.. (1993). Biodiversity prospecting contract.. 255–287.3 indexed citations
13.
Gámez, Rodrigo, Ana Sittenfeld, Walter V. Reid, et al.. (1993). Costa Rica's conservation program and National Biodiversity Institute (INBio).. 53–67.16 indexed citations
14.
Reid, Walter V.. (1993). Biodiversity Indicators for Policy-Makers. Medical Entomology and Zoology.58 indexed citations
Reid, Walter V.. (1991). African center hosts expert workshop on property rights, biotechnology and genetics resources.. Diversity. 7(3). 10–11.3 indexed citations
17.
Reid, Walter V. & Mark C. Trexler. (1991). Drowning the national heritage : climate change and U.S. coastal biodiversity.7 indexed citations
18.
Reid, Walter V. & Kenton R. Miller. (1989). Keeping Options Alive: The Scientific Basis for Conserving Biodiversity. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).251 indexed citations
19.
Reid, Walter V.. (1988). Fledging Success of Experimentally Enlarged Broods of the Glaucous-winged Gull. Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.