W. Schappert

4.2k total citations
25 papers, 87 citations indexed

About

W. Schappert is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Schappert has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 87 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 19 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 14 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in W. Schappert's work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (21 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (15 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (13 papers). W. Schappert is often cited by papers focused on Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (21 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (15 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (13 papers). W. Schappert collaborates with scholars based in United States. W. Schappert's co-authors include Yuriy Pischalnikov, A.H. Lumpkin, J. E. Pilcher, A. Possoz, T. Khabiboulline, F. S. Merritt, D. A. Sergatskov, M. J. Oreglia, K. J. Anderson and T. Peterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science and IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

In The Last Decade

W. Schappert

20 papers receiving 80 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. Schappert United States 6 57 56 46 25 21 25 87
C. Beard United Kingdom 6 71 1.2× 65 1.2× 35 0.8× 29 1.2× 27 1.3× 33 98
Y. Ivanyushenkov United Kingdom 6 63 1.1× 63 1.1× 62 1.3× 30 1.2× 13 0.6× 23 98
Karel Cornelis Switzerland 6 61 1.1× 69 1.2× 32 0.7× 30 1.2× 19 0.9× 42 90
D J Scott United Kingdom 6 63 1.1× 69 1.2× 48 1.0× 25 1.0× 14 0.7× 23 94
B. Gastineau France 6 64 1.1× 28 0.5× 53 1.2× 25 1.0× 14 0.7× 18 88
A. Mikhailichenko United States 6 57 1.0× 66 1.2× 38 0.8× 60 2.4× 32 1.5× 43 129
M. Pekeler United States 6 110 1.9× 91 1.6× 66 1.4× 21 0.8× 27 1.3× 36 124
Fanouria Antoniou Switzerland 5 48 0.8× 61 1.1× 30 0.7× 35 1.4× 16 0.8× 41 84
A. Butterworth Switzerland 6 57 1.0× 76 1.4× 36 0.8× 32 1.3× 18 0.9× 40 95
R. Muto Japan 5 39 0.7× 36 0.6× 22 0.5× 31 1.2× 11 0.5× 32 80

Countries citing papers authored by W. Schappert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Schappert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Schappert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Schappert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Schappert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Schappert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Schappert. The network helps show where W. Schappert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Schappert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Schappert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Schappert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Schappert. W. Schappert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pischalnikov, Yuriy, et al.. (2018). Improved RF measurements of SRF cavity quality factors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 913. 7–14. 5 indexed citations
2.
Hansen, Benjamin, Arkadiy Klebaner, Y. Pischalnikov, et al.. (2017). Effects of thermal acoustic oscillations on LCLS-II cryomodule testing. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 278. 12188–12188. 4 indexed citations
3.
Awida, Mohamed H., I. Gonin, T. Khabiboulline, et al.. (2017). Development of Low $\beta$ Single-Spoke Resonators for the Front End of the Proton Improvement Plan-II at Fermilab. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 64(9). 2450–2464. 11 indexed citations
4.
Pischalnikov, Yuriy, et al.. (2015). Design and Test of the Compact Tuner for Narrow Bandwidth SRF Cavities. JACOW. 3352–3354. 4 indexed citations
5.
Schappert, W., et al.. (2015). Progress at FNAL in the Field of the Active Resonance Control for Narrow Bandwidth SRF Cavities.. JACOW. 3355–3357. 3 indexed citations
6.
Höcker, A., et al.. (2014). RF Tests of Dressed 325 MHz Single-Spoke Resonators at 2 K. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ambrosio, G., N. Andreev, S. Fehér, et al.. (2013). Challenges and Design of the Transport Solenoid for the Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 24(3). 1–5. 11 indexed citations
8.
Pagani, C., Rocco Paparella, A. Bosotti, et al.. (2011). TUNER PERFORMANCE IN THE S1-GLOBAL CRYOMODULE. 110904. 286–288.
9.
Pischalnikov, Yuriy & W. Schappert. (2011). Resonance control in SRF cavities at FNAL. 1 indexed citations
10.
Nicol, T., et al.. (2011). Cryomodule Design for 325 MHz Superconducting Single Spoke Cavities and Solenoids. 110328. 970–972. 2 indexed citations
11.
Schappert, W., Yuriy Pischalnikov, H. Hayano, et al.. (2011). ADAPTIVE LORENTZ FORCE DETUNING COMPENSATION IN THE ILC S1-G CRYOMODULE AT KEK.
12.
Pischalnikov, Yuriy, et al.. (2009). A tuner for a 325 MHz SRF spoke cavity. Presented at. 2 indexed citations
13.
Arkan, T., et al.. (2009). Transport of DESY 1.3 GHZ Cryomodule at Fermilab. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
14.
Olis, Dan, et al.. (2009). Transatlantic Transport of Fermilab 3.9 GHZ Cryomodule to DESY. 2 indexed citations
15.
DiMarco, J., David J. Harding, V.S. Kashikhin, et al.. (2008). A Fast-Sampling, Fixed Coil Array for Measuring the AC Field of Fermilab Booster Corrector Magnets. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 18(2). 1633–1636. 5 indexed citations
16.
DiMarco, J., David J. Harding, V.S. Kashikhin, et al.. (2007). A fast-sampling, fixed coil array for measuring the AC field of Fermilab Booster corrector magnets. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
17.
Foster, G. W., et al.. (2004). Bunch-by-bunch digital dampers for the Fermilab main injector and recycler. 323–325. 4 indexed citations
18.
Lumpkin, A.H., et al.. (2004). Optical transition radiation imaging of intense proton beams at FNAL. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 51(4). 1529–1532. 10 indexed citations
19.
Anderson, K. J., F. S. Merritt, M. J. Oreglia, et al.. (1988). A study of the self-quenched streamer mode using a nitrogen laser. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 267(2-3). 396–407. 8 indexed citations
20.
Anderson, K. J., F. S. Merritt, M. J. Oreglia, et al.. (1988). Influence of gas mixture and primary ionization on the performance of limited streamer mode tubes. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 267(2-3). 386–395. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026