Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Voyager 1 Explores the Termination Shock Region and the Heliosheath Beyond
2005388 citationsE. C. Stone, A. C. Cummings et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of W. R. Webber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. R. Webber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. R. Webber more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. R. Webber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. R. Webber. The network helps show where W. R. Webber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. R. Webber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. R. Webber.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. R. Webber based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with W. R. Webber. W. R. Webber is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McDonald, F. B., W. R. Webber, & D. V. Reames. (2008). The Unusual Time History of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays at 1 AU over the Solar Minimum of Cycle 23. AGUFM. 2008.1 indexed citations
2.
McDonald, F. B., W. R. Webber, E. C. Stone, et al.. (2005). Voyager Observations of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Heliosheath and Over the Solar Maximum Period of Cycle 23. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2. 273.1 indexed citations
3.
Lukasiak, A., F. B. McDonald, & W. R. Webber. (1997). Study of Elemental and Isotopic Composition of Cosmic Ray Nuclei Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn and Fe. ICRC. 3. 357.
4.
Lukasiak, A., F. B. McDonald, & W. R. Webber. (1997). Voyager Measurements of the Isotopic Composition of Li, Be and B Nuclei. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 3. 389.2 indexed citations
5.
Lukasiak, A., F. B. McDonald, W. R. Webber, & P. Ferrando. (1995). Voyager Measurements of the Isotopic Composition of Sc, Ti, V, Cr Mn and Fe Nuclei. ICRC. 2. 576.3 indexed citations
6.
Haasbroek, L. J., M. S. Potgieter, & W. R. Webber. (1995). Cosmic-Ray Electron Modulation using Current Knowledge of the Heliosphere. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 4. 706.3 indexed citations
7.
Крайнев, М. Б. & W. R. Webber. (1993). The Galactic Cosmic Rays Near the Solar Activity Minimum II. The Model for the Behavior of Positive and Negative Cosmic Rays Near the Current Sheet. 3. 555.2 indexed citations
8.
Крайнев, М. Б. & W. R. Webber. (1993). The Galactic Cosmic Rays Near the Solar Activity Minimum I. The Sensitivity of Positive and Negative Cosmic Rays to the Tilt of the Heliospheric Current Sheet. 3. 551.2 indexed citations
9.
Basini, G., Maria Teresa Brunetti, A. Codino, et al.. (1991). Observations of Cosmic Ray Electrons and Positrons Using an Imaging Calorimeter. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 2. 137.
10.
McDonald, F. B., J. H. Trainor, & W. R. Webber. (1982). Pioneer and Voyager observations of Forbush decreases between 6 and 24 AU. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 10. 147–150.8 indexed citations
11.
Webber, W. R.. (1979). Solar Modulation Effects on Low Energy Interstellar Electrons. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 3. 73.1 indexed citations
12.
Webber, W. R., et al.. (1979). Further Studies of the Isotopic Composition of Cosmic Ray li, BE and B Nuclei - Implications for the Cosmic Ray Age. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 1. 389.3 indexed citations
13.
Webber, W. R., J. A. Lezniak, J. C. Kish, & G. A. Simpson. (1977). A Measurement of the Abundance of Cosmic Ray 10 BE and its Implications for the Cosmic Ray Age. 18. 125.1 indexed citations
14.
Webber, W. R., et al.. (1973). Measurements of the primary cosmic ray electron spectrum from 1965 to 1972. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 2. 760.4 indexed citations
15.
Lezniak, J. A., T. T. von Rosenvinge, & W. R. Webber. (1970). The chemical composition and energy spectra of cosmic ray nuclei with Z=3-30. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 1. 375.2 indexed citations
16.
Webber, W. R.. (1966). Solar modulation of protons and helium nuclei during the period 1963-1965.. ICRC. 1. 345.5 indexed citations
17.
Ormes, J. F., Tycho von Rosenvinge, & W. R. Webber. (1966). Measurements of the energy spectrum of nuclei with Z greater than 3 in the primary radiation using a balloon borne Cerenkov-scintillation counter.. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 1. 407.4 indexed citations
18.
Ormes, J. F. & W. R. Webber. (1966). Measurements of the primary proton and helium spectra and their modulations using a balloon- borne Cerenkov-scintillation counter.. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 1. 349.21 indexed citations
19.
Webber, W. R., et al.. (1963). Low Energy Protons, Deuterium and Alpha Particles in the Primary Spectrum in 1965 at Ft. Churchill and Minneapolis. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 3. 69.1 indexed citations
20.
Webber, W. R. & J. F. Ormes. (1963). Light, Medium and Heavy Nuclei in the Primary Spectrum in 1963 at Minneapolis. ICRC. 3. 3.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.