Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Crystallographic studies of the role of Mg as a stabilizing impurity in β-Ca3(PO4)2. The crystal structure of pure β-Ca3(PO4)2
1974447 citationsBrian Dickens, W. E. Brown et al.Journal of Solid State Chemistryprofile →
Octacalcium Phosphate and Hydroxyapatite: Crystallographic and Chemical Relations between Octacalcium Phosphate and Hydroxyapatite
1962424 citationsW. E. Brown, James P. Smith et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of W. E. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. E. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. E. Brown more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. E. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. E. Brown. The network helps show where W. E. Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. E. Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. E. Brown.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. E. Brown based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with W. E. Brown. W. E. Brown is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tomažič, B., Chakwan Siew, & W. E. Brown. (1991). A Comparative Study of Bovine Pericardium Mineralization: A Basic and Practical Approach. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 1(3). 4.3 indexed citations
Brown, W. E., et al.. (1987). Diffusion Controlled Dissolution and Precipitation. Croatica Chemica Acta. 60(3). 591–594.3 indexed citations
7.
Takagi, S., M. Mathew, & W. E. Brown. (1986). Crystal structures of bobierrite and synthetic Mg 3 (PO 4 ) 2 .8H 2 O. American Mineralogist. 71. 1229–1233.27 indexed citations
Dickens, Brian, F. A. Mauer, & W. E. Brown. (1970). A refinement of the crystal structure of Na2CO3 H2O. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section A Physics and Chemistry. 74A(3). 319–319.9 indexed citations
Brown, W. E. & Earl F. Epstein. (1965). Crystallography of tetracalcium phosphate. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section A Physics and Chemistry. 69A(6). 547–547.81 indexed citations
17.
Smith, James P. & W. E. Brown. (1959). X-ray studies of aluminum and iron phosphates containing potassium or ammonium. American Mineralogist. 44. 138–142.14 indexed citations
18.
Brown, Earl H., W. E. Brown, James R. Lehr, James P. Smith, & A. W. Frazier. (1958). Calcium Ammonium Pyrophosphates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 62(3). 366–367.6 indexed citations
19.
Brown, W. E., James R. Lehr, James P. Smith, & A. W. Frazier. (1957). CRYSTALLOGRAPHY OF OCTACALCIUM PHOSPHATE. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 79(19). 5318–5319.120 indexed citations
20.
Smith, James P., James R. Lehr, & W. E. Brown. (1955). Crystallography of monocalcium and dicalcium phosphates. American Mineralogist. 40. 893–899.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.