W. Diehl

1.1k total citations
25 papers, 710 citations indexed

About

W. Diehl is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Diehl has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 710 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 12 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in W. Diehl's work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (18 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (15 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (11 papers). W. Diehl is often cited by papers focused on Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (18 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (15 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (11 papers). W. Diehl collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. W. Diehl's co-authors include Kurt Hecher, L. Zikulnig, Ágnes Huber, Thomas Bregenzer, Bernhard-Joachim Hackelöer, Anke Diemert, B.‐J. Hackelöer, Susanne Sehner, Bettina Hollwitz and Karl Wegscheider and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

W. Diehl

25 papers receiving 683 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. Diehl Germany 14 646 442 147 99 25 25 710
Arlyn Llanes United States 14 537 0.8× 290 0.7× 148 1.0× 100 1.0× 22 0.9× 61 597
Kinga Chalubinski Austria 14 271 0.4× 278 0.6× 141 1.0× 96 1.0× 16 0.6× 40 444
Masahiro Sumie Japan 14 386 0.6× 232 0.5× 77 0.5× 129 1.3× 21 0.8× 38 523
M. Essaoui France 12 568 0.9× 339 0.8× 108 0.7× 79 0.8× 40 1.6× 26 617
Barrett K. Robinson United States 11 331 0.5× 443 1.0× 281 1.9× 63 0.6× 10 0.4× 21 560
David Schrimmer United States 12 419 0.6× 376 0.9× 136 0.9× 121 1.2× 18 0.7× 19 599
Keren Ofir Israel 9 311 0.5× 320 0.7× 165 1.1× 28 0.3× 8 0.3× 14 387
Jean-Bernard Truc France 7 235 0.4× 242 0.5× 147 1.0× 74 0.7× 11 0.4× 9 324
Benjamin D. Byers United States 7 140 0.2× 180 0.4× 90 0.6× 111 1.1× 41 1.6× 14 308
Erasmo Huertas Peru 8 233 0.4× 225 0.5× 79 0.5× 31 0.3× 10 0.4× 27 321

Countries citing papers authored by W. Diehl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Diehl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Diehl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Diehl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Diehl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Diehl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Diehl. The network helps show where W. Diehl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Diehl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Diehl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Diehl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Diehl. W. Diehl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Diehl, W., et al.. (2019). Congenital hepatoblastoma in a growing health economy. BMJ Case Reports. 12(3). e223344–e223344. 4 indexed citations
2.
Diehl, W., et al.. (2017). Fetoscopic laser coagulation in 1020 pregnancies with twin–twin transfusion syndrome demonstrates improvement in double‐twin survival rate. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 50(6). 728–735. 53 indexed citations
3.
Blohm, Martin, W. Diehl, Tanja Zeller, et al.. (2016). Cardiovascular biomarkers in paired maternal and umbilical cord blood samples at term and near term delivery. Early Human Development. 94. 7–12. 11 indexed citations
4.
Wohlmuth, Christoph, Helena M. Gardiner, W. Diehl, & Kurt Hecher. (2016). Fetal cardiovascular hemodynamics in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 95(6). 664–671. 28 indexed citations
5.
Tachibana, Daisuke, W. Diehl, Norio Wada, et al.. (2014). Time‐interval analysis of ductus venosus flow velocity waveforms in twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 45(5). 544–550. 21 indexed citations
6.
Diehl, W., Anke Diemert, & Kurt Hecher. (2013). Twin–twin transfusion syndrome: Treatment and outcome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 28(2). 227–238. 19 indexed citations
7.
Diehl, W., et al.. (2013). Twin anemia–polycythemia sequence in a case of monoamniotic twins. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 42(1). 108–111. 24 indexed citations
8.
Hillebrand, Georg, Britta Goldmann, W. Diehl, et al.. (2013). Peripartale Kardiomyopathie. Der Anaesthesist. 62(5). 343–354. 4 indexed citations
9.
Diemert, Anke, et al.. (2012). Intrauterine Surgery. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. 109(38). 603–38. 9 indexed citations
10.
Diemert, Anke, et al.. (2011). The combination of intrauterine balloon tamponade and the B-Lynch procedure for the treatment of severe postpartum hemorrhage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 206(1). 65.e1–65.e4. 48 indexed citations
11.
Diehl, W., et al.. (2010). OP06.02: Development of survival rates after intrauterine laser therapy for severe mid‐trimester twin–twin transfusion syndrome: experience with 600 cases. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 36(S1). 67–67. 6 indexed citations
12.
Diemert, Anke, et al.. (2009). Laser therapy of twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome in triplet pregnancies. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 35(1). 71–74. 14 indexed citations
13.
Diehl, W. & Kurt Hecher. (2007). Selective cord coagulation in acardiac twins. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 12(6). 458–463. 27 indexed citations
14.
Huber, Ágnes, W. Diehl, Thomas Bregenzer, B.‐J. Hackelöer, & Kurt Hecher. (2006). Stage-Related Outcome in Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome Treated by Fetoscopic Laser Coagulation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 108(2). 333–337. 107 indexed citations
15.
Huber, Ágnes, W. Diehl, L. Zikulnig, et al.. (2005). Perinatal outcome in monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by amniotic fluid discordance without severe twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 27(1). 48–52. 46 indexed citations
16.
Huber, Ágnes, W. Diehl, L. Zikulnig, et al.. (2004). Amniotic Fluid and Maternal Blood Characteristics in Severe Mid-Trimester Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 19(6). 504–509. 7 indexed citations
17.
18.
Hecher, Kurt, et al.. (2000). Endoscopic laser coagulation of placental anastomoses in 200 pregnancies with severe mid-trimester twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 92(1). 135–139. 158 indexed citations
19.
Diehl, W. & Detlev Stöver. (1990). Injection moulding of superalloys and intermetallic phases. Metal Powder Report. 45(5). 333–338. 4 indexed citations
20.
Diehl, W., et al.. (1987). Failure of conservative management of splenic rupture in a patient with mononucleosis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 22(11). 1034–1035. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Arlyn Llanes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kinga Chalubinski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Masahiro Sumie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Essaoui Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barrett K. Robinson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Schrimmer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Keren Ofir Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean-Bernard Truc Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benjamin D. Byers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Erasmo Huertas
Rankless by CCL
2026