W. D. Getty

30 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

W. D. Getty
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 157
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 98
  • Aerospace Engineering 129
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 146
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 245
Replace Ya.B. Fainberg with:
Ya.B. Fainberg Ukraine
R.E. Peterkin United States
D. Diebold United States
D. S. Prono United States
Toshihiko Dote Japan
W. Peter United States
T. C. Genoni United States
G. Hairapetian United States
Akio Komori Japan
G. G. Borg Australia
W. D. Getty relative to Ya.B. Fainberg Ukraine Ya.B. Fainberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ya.B. Fainberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. D. Getty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. D. Getty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. D. Getty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. D. Getty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. D. Getty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. D. Getty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. D. Getty. The network helps show where W. D. Getty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. D. Getty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. D. Getty Line = papers co-authored together W. D. Getty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196380
2 196255
3 197734
4 198532
5 200125
6 198723
7 199016
8 197615
9 199414
10 198611
11 199410
12 20078
13 19888
14 19946
15 19716
16 19726
17 19906
18 19814
19 19914
20 19913

About W. D. Getty

W. D. Getty is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Aerospace Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 34 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (14 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (14 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (12 papers), Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (11 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers) and Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (157 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (98 citations), Aerospace Engineering (129 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (146 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (245 citations). W. D. Getty has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include L. D. Smullin, R. M. Gilgenbach, J.H. Booske, R.A. Jong, P. Colestock, Y. Y. Lau, M.L. Brake, S. Bernabei, F.J. Paoloni and Mark A. Heald. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review Letters and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact