W CLIBY

551 total citations
10 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

W CLIBY is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, W CLIBY has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in W CLIBY's work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers). W CLIBY is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers). W CLIBY collaborates with scholars based in United States and Italy. W CLIBY's co-authors include Karl C. Podratz, Sean C. Dowdy, Giovanni Aletti, Andrea Mariani, Gary L. Keeney, Mike Thomas, E. A. Eisenhauer, D.S. Chi, Giacomo Aletti and Robert G. Bristow and has published in prestigious journals such as Gynecologic Oncology and International Journal of Oncology.

In The Last Decade

W CLIBY

10 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
W CLIBY United States	7	300	249	168	64	38	10	438
Ali Kucukmetin United Kingdom	13	254 0.8×	346 1.4×	142 0.8×	47 0.7×	59 1.6×	29	531
Amy E. Bland United States	10	185 0.6×	229 0.9×	57 0.3×	66 1.0×	32 0.8×	15	361
Hannah S. van Meurs Netherlands	9	312 1.0×	158 0.6×	139 0.8×	39 0.6×	61 1.6×	11	349
Justine M. Briët Netherlands	7	261 0.9×	349 1.4×	62 0.4×	51 0.8×	21 0.6×	10	440
Matteo Marchetti Italy	10	145 0.5×	143 0.6×	70 0.4×	33 0.5×	17 0.4×	43	282
Meghna Datta United States	6	245 0.8×	247 1.0×	72 0.4×	27 0.4×	15 0.4×	13	366
Cem İyibozkurt Türkiye	9	155 0.5×	124 0.5×	86 0.5×	47 0.7×	53 1.4×	23	302
Blessing Ja United States	11	221 0.7×	298 1.2×	118 0.7×	51 0.8×	105 2.8×	17	421
Yasushi Kotani Japan	10	235 0.8×	181 0.7×	73 0.4×	24 0.4×	11 0.3×	30	324
G.C. Reid United States	6	93 0.3×	135 0.5×	83 0.5×	40 0.6×	41 1.1×	7	294

Countries citing papers authored by W CLIBY

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W CLIBY's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W CLIBY with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W CLIBY more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W CLIBY

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W CLIBY. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W CLIBY. The network helps show where W CLIBY may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W CLIBY

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W CLIBY. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W CLIBY based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W CLIBY. W CLIBY is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Weaver, Amy L., et al.. (2019). Depth of bowel invasion in ovarian cancer is not associated with worse outcomes. Gynecologic Oncology. 154(1). e20–e21. 2 indexed citations

Multinu, Francesco, et al.. (2017). Vaginal vs. robotic hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer: A comparison of outcomes and cost of care. Gynecologic Oncology. 145(3). 555–561. 13 indexed citations

Kumar, Sanjeev, Jamie N. Bakkum‐Gamez, Amy L. Weaver, et al.. (2012). Redefining the risk of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: A large prospective cohort study with a uniform surgical approach. Gynecologic Oncology. 125. S46–S47. 2 indexed citations

Thomas, Mike, Andrea Mariani, W CLIBY, et al.. (2007). Role of cytoreduction in stage III and IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 107(2). 190–193. 63 indexed citations

Dowdy, Sean C., et al.. (2007). Treatment of pulmonary recurrences in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 107(2). 242–247. 21 indexed citations

Aletti, Giovanni, E. A. Eisenhauer, Giacomo Aletti, et al.. (2007). A new frontier for quality of care in gynecologic oncology surgery: Multi-institutional assessment of short-term outcomes for ovarian cancer using a risk-adjusted model. Gynecologic Oncology. 107(1). 99–106. 161 indexed citations

Thomas, Mike, Andrea Mariani, W CLIBY, et al.. (2007). Role of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant therapy in stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 107(2). 186–189. 53 indexed citations

Aletti, Giovanni, Sean C. Dowdy, Karl C. Podratz, & W CLIBY. (2006). Analysis of factors impacting operability in stage IV ovarian cancer: Rationale use of a triage system. Gynecologic Oncology. 105(1). 84–89. 50 indexed citations

Staub, Julie, et al.. (1999). Involvement of H-cadherin (CDH13) on 16q in the region of frequent deletion in ovarian cancer.. International Journal of Oncology. 15(4). 715–20. 72 indexed citations

10.

Clarke-Pearson, D., John T. Soper, A. Berchuck, et al.. (1992). Closed retroperitoneal suction drainage following selective lymphadenectomy: Risks and benefits. Gynecologic Oncology. 45(1). 89–89. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact