This map shows the geographic impact of V.–P. Gabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V.–P. Gabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V.–P. Gabel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by V.–P. Gabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V.–P. Gabel. The network helps show where V.–P. Gabel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of V.–P. Gabel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of V.–P. Gabel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of V.–P. Gabel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with V.–P. Gabel. V.–P. Gabel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Florian Gekeler, Dorothea Besch, et al.. (2010). Subretinal Visual Prosthetic Devices in Blind Patients. Modifications in Transchoroidal Surgery and Long Term Follow Up in the First 12 Patients. 51(13). 2024–2024.
2.
Gekeler, Florian, Dorothea Besch, Barbara Wilhelm, et al.. (2009). The Transchoroidal Implantation of Subretinal Active Micro-Photodiode Arrays in Blind Patients: Long Term Surgical Results in the First 11 Implanted Patients Demonstrating the Potential and Safety of This New Complex Surgical Procedure That Allows Restoration of Useful Visual Percepts. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 4742–4742.3 indexed citations
3.
Wilke, Robert, et al.. (2006). Subretinal Chronic Multi–Electrode Arrays in Blind Patients: Perception of Dots and Patterns. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 3202–3202.10 indexed citations
Gekeler, Florian, et al.. (2006). Subretinal Chronic Active Visual Prostheses in Blind Patients: The Transchoroidal Surgical Procedure. 47(13). 3207–3207.2 indexed citations
6.
Mecklenburg, Lars, et al.. (2005). Evaluation of Retina in Perfusion Tissue Culture as an in vitro Model for Toxic Retinopathies. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 3954–3954.1 indexed citations
7.
Herrmann, Wolfgang, CP Lohmann, Chirag P. Shah, et al.. (2005). Tear Film Function and Corneal Sensation After LASEK for the Correction of Myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 4382–4382.1 indexed citations
Zrenner, Eberhart, et al.. (2004). How to assess and compare visual function in blind patients with electronic neuroprostheses. 45(13). 4226–4226.1 indexed citations
10.
Nisch, W., et al.. (2003). Long Term Retinal Function after Repeated Ab Externo Implantation and Explantation of Subretinal Electronic Devices in Rabbit. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 5076–5076.1 indexed citations
11.
Gabel, V.–P., Florian Gekeler, Thomas Schanze, et al.. (2002). Subretinal Implant Surgery in a Series of 26 Cat Eyes to Prove Evidence of Cortical Activation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 2845–2845.1 indexed citations
12.
Wild, Brigitte, et al.. (2002). Expression of Collagen Type II by Hyalocytes In Vitro - First Steps Towards a Biological Vitreous Substitute. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 3495–3495.1 indexed citations
13.
Shinoda, Kei, et al.. (2002). Ab Externo-Implantation, -Explantation and Postoperative Follow Up of Subretinal Electronic Devices. 43(13). 4471–4471.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.