Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Recovery of lithium and cobalt from waste lithium ion batteries of mobile phone
2013345 citationsManis Kumar Jha, Anjan Kumari et al.Waste Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Vinay Kumar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vinay Kumar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vinay Kumar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vinay Kumar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vinay Kumar. The network helps show where Vinay Kumar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vinay Kumar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vinay Kumar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vinay Kumar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Vinay Kumar. Vinay Kumar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jha, Manis Kumar, et al.. (2013). Recovery of lithium and cobalt from waste lithium ion batteries of mobile phone. Waste Management. 33(9). 1890–1897.345 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Jha, Manis Kumar, et al.. (2013). Recycling of Precious Metal Gold from Waste Electrical andElectronic Equipments (WEEE): A review.3 indexed citations
Sahu, Swagatika, et al.. (2008). Recovery of chromium (VI) from electroplating effluent by solvent extraction with tri-n-butyl phosphate. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 15(4). 397–402.30 indexed citations
14.
Jha, Manis Kumar, Vinay Kumar, & Jaechun Lee. (2007). Processing of electroplating effluent for the recovery of zinc and chromium using ion exchange technique. 25(6). 1227–36.2 indexed citations
15.
Jha, Manis Kumar, et al.. (2005). Recovery of zinc from electroplating effluent using cationic resins. 47(4). 177–187.4 indexed citations
16.
Jha, Manis Kumar, et al.. (2005). Extraction and separation of Zn and Ca from solution using thiophosphinic extractant. 47(2). 71–83.2 indexed citations
17.
Jha, Manis Kumar & Vinay Kumar. (2005). Recovery of zinc from aqueous solutions by ion exchange process - A review. 47(3). 119–128.4 indexed citations
18.
Agrawal, Atul, Sarita Kumari, Manoranjan Kumar Manoj, et al.. (2002). Seperation & Recovery of Copper & Nickel from Copper Bleed Stream by Solvent Extraction Route.1 indexed citations
19.
Kumar, Vinay, et al.. (1997). Separation of copper and zinc from complex sulphate solutions by using LIX84. Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy. 26(2). 74–78.5 indexed citations
20.
Jana, Rajkumar, Vinay Kumar, Anil Saha, et al.. (1996). Processing of Tungsten Alloy Scrap for the Recovery of Tungsten Metal.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.