Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Elastomeric Transistor Stamps: Reversible Probing of Charge Transport in Organic Crystals
20041.4k citationsVikram Sundar, Jana Zaumseil et al.Scienceprofile →
Self-Assembly of CdSe−ZnS Quantum Dot Bioconjugates Using an Engineered Recombinant Protein
20001.4k citationsHedi Mattoussi, J. Matthew Mauro et al.Journal of the American Chemical Societyprofile →
Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: Structural Hierarchy from the Nanoscale to the Macroscale
2005916 citationsJoanna Aizenberg, James C. Weaver et al.Scienceprofile →
Full Color Emission from II-VI Semiconductor Quantum Dot-Polymer Composites
2000681 citationsJ. Lee, Vikram Sundar et al.Advanced Materialsprofile →
Quantum-dot optical temperature probes
2003342 citationsGlen W. Walker, Vikram Sundar et al.Applied Physics Lettersprofile →
Color-selective semiconductor nanocrystal laser
2002278 citationsHans‐Jürgen Eisler, Vikram Sundar et al.Applied Physics Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Vikram Sundar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vikram Sundar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vikram Sundar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vikram Sundar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vikram Sundar. The network helps show where Vikram Sundar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vikram Sundar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vikram Sundar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vikram Sundar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Vikram Sundar. Vikram Sundar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Aizenberg, Joanna, James C. Weaver, Monica Thanawala, et al.. (2005). Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: Structural Hierarchy from the Nanoscale to the Macroscale. Science. 309(5732). 275–278.916 indexed citations breakdown →
Sundar, Vikram, A. D. Yablon, J. L. Grazul, Micha Ilan, & Joanna Aizenberg. (2003). Fibre-optical features of a glass sponge. Nature. 424(6951). 899–900.217 indexed citations
12.
Walker, Glen W., Vikram Sundar, Christina M. Rudzinski, et al.. (2003). Quantum-dot optical temperature probes. Applied Physics Letters. 83(17). 3555–3557.342 indexed citations breakdown →
Mattoussi, Hedi, J. Matthew Mauro, Ellen R. Goldman, et al.. (2000). Self-Assembly of CdSe−ZnS Quantum Dot Bioconjugates Using an Engineered Recombinant Protein. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 122(49). 12142–12150.1399 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Lee, J., Vikram Sundar, Johanna Heine, Moungi G. Bawendi, & Klavs F. Jensen. (2000). Full Color Emission from II-VI Semiconductor Quantum Dot-Polymer Composites. Advanced Materials. 12(15). 1102–1105.681 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.