Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Development of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC)
2013347 citationsErik G. Takhounts, Matthew Craig et al.SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Vikas Hasija's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vikas Hasija with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vikas Hasija more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vikas Hasija. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vikas Hasija. The network helps show where Vikas Hasija may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vikas Hasija
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vikas Hasija.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vikas Hasija based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Vikas Hasija. Vikas Hasija is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hasija, Vikas, et al.. (2020). Effect of angular acceleration on brain injury metric.2 indexed citations
4.
Hasija, Vikas, et al.. (2019). Simulation Assessment of Injury Trends for 50th Percentile Males Using Potential Seating Configurations of Future Automated Driving System (Ads) Equipped Vehicles.3 indexed citations
5.
Takhounts, Erik G., et al.. (2017). Investigation of parameters affecting brain model validation and brain strains using the SIMon finite element head model.5 indexed citations
6.
Takhounts, Erik G., Matthew Craig, Kevin Moorhouse, Joe McFadden, & Vikas Hasija. (2013). Development of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC). SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 243–66.347 indexed citations breakdown →
Takhounts, Erik G., Vikas Hasija, Stephen A. Ridella, Steven Rowson, & Stefan M. Duma. (2011). Kinematic Rotational Brain Injury Criterion (BRIC).53 indexed citations
9.
Takhounts, Erik G., Vikas Hasija, & Rolf H. Eppinger. (2009). Analysis of 3D Rigid Body Motion Using the Nine Accelerometer Array and the Randomly Distributed In-Plane Accelerometer Systems. 2009.3 indexed citations
10.
Hasija, Vikas, Erik G. Takhounts, & Stephen A. Ridella. (2009). Computerized Crash Reconstruction of Real World Crashes Using Optimization Methodology. 2009.2 indexed citations
Hasija, Vikas, Erik G. Takhounts, & Stephen A. Ridella. (2007). Computational Analysis of Real World Crashes: A Basis for Accident Reconstruction Methodology. 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.3 indexed citations
14.
Hasija, Vikas, Erik G. Takhounts, & Rolf H. Eppinger. (2004). Finding 3D angular accelerations of a rigid body from in-plane accelerometers using optimization.2 indexed citations
15.
Takhounts, Erik G., Rolf H. Eppinger, Rabih E. Tannous, et al.. (2003). Analysis of 3D rigid body motion using the nine accelerometer array system.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.