Vanessa Scarf

1.0k total citations
47 papers, 598 citations indexed

About

Vanessa Scarf is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Vanessa Scarf has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 598 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 35 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Vanessa Scarf's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (32 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (25 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (11 papers). Vanessa Scarf is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (32 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (25 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (11 papers). Vanessa Scarf collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Ethiopia and United States. Vanessa Scarf's co-authors include Caroline Homer, Hannah Dahlen, Maralyn Foureur, Chris Rossiter, Christine Catling, Charlene Thornton, David Sibbritt, Deborah Fox, David Ellwood and Helen McLachlan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Vanessa Scarf

39 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Vanessa Scarf Australia 13 458 402 138 87 86 47 598
Ellen L. Tilden United States 17 566 1.2× 492 1.2× 212 1.5× 107 1.2× 74 0.9× 53 757
Tanya Farrell Australia 9 379 0.8× 298 0.7× 137 1.0× 76 0.9× 55 0.6× 29 501
Ben Moore United States 2 478 1.0× 472 1.2× 117 0.8× 137 1.6× 37 0.4× 4 649
Angela Reitsma Canada 9 484 1.1× 401 1.0× 204 1.5× 61 0.7× 85 1.0× 15 623
Mónica Chamillard Argentina 6 781 1.7× 709 1.8× 201 1.5× 111 1.3× 142 1.7× 10 957
Courtney L. Everson United States 9 278 0.6× 206 0.5× 78 0.6× 48 0.6× 100 1.2× 11 362
Betty‐Anne Daviss Canada 8 435 0.9× 378 0.9× 163 1.2× 53 0.6× 86 1.0× 14 564
Johanna P. de Graaf Netherlands 12 270 0.6× 297 0.7× 137 1.0× 167 1.9× 56 0.7× 27 507
Sebastian Leathersich Australia 7 324 0.7× 308 0.8× 109 0.8× 41 0.5× 82 1.0× 17 435
Lee Saxell Canada 9 234 0.5× 173 0.4× 77 0.6× 87 1.0× 54 0.6× 11 326

Countries citing papers authored by Vanessa Scarf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vanessa Scarf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vanessa Scarf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vanessa Scarf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vanessa Scarf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vanessa Scarf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vanessa Scarf. The network helps show where Vanessa Scarf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vanessa Scarf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vanessa Scarf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vanessa Scarf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vanessa Scarf. Vanessa Scarf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Kassa, Zemenu Yohannes, Vanessa Scarf, Sabera Turkmani, & Deborah Fox. (2024). Impact of COVID-19 on Maternal Health Service Uptake and Perinatal Outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 21(9). 1188–1188. 1 indexed citations
4.
Callander, Emily, Vanessa Scarf, Andrea Nove, et al.. (2024). Midwife-led birthing centres in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Uganda: an economic evaluation of case study sites. BMJ Global Health. 9(3). e013643–e013643.
6.
Kassa, Zemenu Yohannes, Vanessa Scarf, Sabera Turkmani, & Deborah Fox. (2024). Impact of COVID-19 on antenatal care provision at public hospitals in the Sidama region, Ethiopia: A mixed methods study. PLoS ONE. 19(4). e0301994–e0301994. 1 indexed citations
7.
Fox, Deborah, et al.. (2024). Tending to the machine: The impact of intrapartum fetal surveillance on women in Australia. PLoS ONE. 19(5). e0303072–e0303072. 5 indexed citations
8.
Scarf, Vanessa, et al.. (2023). Australian women’s experiences of wearing a non-invasive fetal electrocardiography (NIFECG) device during labour. Women and Birth. 36(6). 546–551. 5 indexed citations
9.
Kasaye, Habtamu Kebebe, et al.. (2023). The roles of multi-component interventions in reducing mistreatment of women and enhancing respectful maternity care: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 23(1). 305–305. 14 indexed citations
10.
Nove, Andrea, Kirsty Hughes, Sabera Turkmani, et al.. (2023). Which low- and middle-income countries have midwife-led birthing centres and what are the main characteristics of these centres? A scoping review and scoping survey. Midwifery. 123. 103717–103717. 5 indexed citations
11.
Fiebig, Denzil G., et al.. (2022). Private provider incentives in health care: The case of caesarean births. Social Science & Medicine. 294. 114729–114729. 2 indexed citations
12.
Kassa, Zemenu Yohannes, Vanessa Scarf, & Deborah Fox. (2022). The effect of Ebola virus disease on maternal health service utilisation and perinatal outcomes in West Africa: a systematic review. Reproductive Health. 19(1). 35–35. 9 indexed citations
13.
Fox, Deborah, et al.. (2021). Wanting to be ‘with woman’, not with machine: Midwives’ experiences of caring for women being continuously monitored in labour. Women and Birth. 35(4). 387–393. 12 indexed citations
14.
Coates, Dominiek, Angela Makris, Christine Catling, et al.. (2020). A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour. PLoS ONE. 15(1). e0228196–e0228196. 43 indexed citations
15.
Fiebig, Denzil G., et al.. (2020). Birth models of care and intervention rates: The impact of birth centres. Health Policy. 124(12). 1395–1402. 13 indexed citations
16.
Homer, Caroline, Chris Rossiter, Hannah Dahlen, et al.. (2019). Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth in Australia 2000 – 2012: a linked population data study. BMJ Open. 9(10). e029192–e029192. 33 indexed citations
17.
Scarf, Vanessa, Rosalie Viney, Maralyn Foureur, et al.. (2019). Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 19(1). 513–513. 11 indexed citations
18.
Vedam, Saraswathi, Chris Rossiter, Caroline Homer, Kathrin Stoll, & Vanessa Scarf. (2017). The ResQu Index: A new instrument to appraise the quality of research on birth place. PLoS ONE. 12(8). e0182991–e0182991. 17 indexed citations
19.
Homer, Caroline, Charlene Thornton, Vanessa Scarf, et al.. (2014). Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 14(1). 206–206. 55 indexed citations
20.
Sibbritt, David, Christine Catling, Vanessa Scarf, & Caroline Homer. (2013). The profile of women who consult midwives in Australia. Women and Birth. 26(4). 240–245. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026